Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> bsd.upgrade fails and shows following messages with a single partition disk.
>
> ```
> Force checking of clean non-root filesystems? [no] no
> umount: /mnt: Device busy
> Can't umount sd0a!
OK, we figured out what is going on. During upgrade, the async random
seed feedi
Hi,
ipsec_common_input_cb() extracts the inner IP header of IPsec
tunnels. It is never used, so this is useless code.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/ipsec_input.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/ipsec_input.c,v
re
This diff included into the snaps.
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:48, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
> Include missing "sys/refcnt.h" header to unpcb.h to fix libkvm and
> netstat(1) build. No functional changes.
>
> Index: sys/kern/uipc_socket.c
> =
Hi,
This allows to build a kernel without ipsec or inet6.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/ip_ah.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_ah.c,v
retrieving revision 1.167
diff -u -p -r1.167 ip_ah.c
--- netinet/ip_ah.c
Hi,
This adds TDB ref counting to ipsp_spd_lookup().
While there make ip6_output() look a bit more like ip_output().
ok?
bluhm
Index: net/if_bridge.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/net/if_bridge.c,v
retrieving revi
Just enabled hotplugd(8) to handle a single device I'm interested in and
saw it basically duplicating kernel de/attach messages in
/var/log/daemon:
Dec 1 23:36:27 eru hotplugd[26475]: started
Dec 1 23:36:27 eru hotplugd[26475]: uhidev4 attached, class 0
Dec 1 23:36:27 eru hotplugd[26475]: wskbd
• Visa Hankala [2021-12-01 13:21]:
> > sshd[389547]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
> > sshd[63996]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
> > sshd[406934]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
> > sshd[107091]: poll index 1 fd 4 events
On 2021-12-01 10:21, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> > Hi. When remote side in sppp doesn't reply for to PPP IPCP IP-Address
> > sppp will try to negotiate remote IP in endless loop. Instead use
> > 10.64.64.1 + if_index as remote IP.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> To find the ref counting bugs in IPsec tdb I use this trace code.
> Per default there is no change due to #ifdef.
>
> tdb_trace[72]: 3944909: refs 5 +1 cpu1 gettdb_dir:360
> tdb_trace[73]: 3944910: refs 6 +0 cpu1 pfkeyv2_
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 15:04, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > [...]
> > Really, this is the simplest way. The shared lock for the pair of
> > sockets moves re-lock dances to the connect and disconnect stages which
> > should be also protect
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:18:13AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> After installing the most recent snapshot earlier today, I'm seeing
> following messages:
>
> sshd[389547]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
> sshd[63996]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaim
> * Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > > setup & report back.
> >
> > Thanks to all the testers, here's a
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 00:27:06 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:53:34PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This question is mostly for bluhm@. Should the gettdbbyflow() grab the
>> extra reference on returned `tdbp' like other other gettdb*() do? I'm
>> pointing th
On 24/11/21(Wed) 15:04, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> [...]
> Really, this is the simplest way. The shared lock for the pair of
> sockets moves re-lock dances to the connect and disconnect stages which
> should be also protected by locks. And not for the pair. Many SOCK_DGRAM
> sockets could be conne
Hi Martin,
* Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to all the testers, here's a n
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:18:30AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to ref count the TDB that is returned by ipsp_spd_lookup().
>
> Sometimes the TDB returned by ipsp_spd_lookup() is not used. So
> refcounting that, does not make sense. As a first step I want to
> convert ipsp_spd
After installing the most recent snapshot earlier today, I'm seeing
following messages:
sshd[389547]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
sshd[63996]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
sshd[406934]: poll index 1 fd 4 events 0x0 filter -9/0x9005 unclaimed
s
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> Hi. When remote side in sppp doesn't reply for to PPP IPCP IP-Address
> sppp will try to negotiate remote IP in endless loop. Instead use
> 10.64.64.1 + if_index as remote IP.
Why add some arbitrary RFC 1918 IP if negotiation fai
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to
> > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > > > setup & report back.
> > >
> > > Thanks to all the testers, here's a new version th
20 matches
Mail list logo
