From: Brian Brombacher
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:22:23 -0400
> I can see from the Ubuntu dmesg that it’s Xen 4.11.4. What mode are you
> running the OpenBSD vm in (PVH or HVM)? Provide your config file for the vm
> to help answer that.
I was used following command when install OpenBDS.
$ sud
On 21/10/08 05:34PM, aisha wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am still working on the table-procexec for opensmtpd
> and while there, I was thinking of how to do authentication
> using LDAP, which the current table-ldap from ports does not
> support.
> The primary reason for that, I believe, is that LDAP
> aut
Hi all,
I am still working on the table-procexec for opensmtpd
and while there, I was thinking of how to do authentication
using LDAP, which the current table-ldap from ports does not
support.
The primary reason for that, I believe, is that LDAP
authentication should be done by bind and not by re
This is a rewording of my later posts to bugs@ in:
https://marc.info/?t=16330937691&r=1&w=2
RFC 7231 [HTTP 1.1] states that, for a HEAD request, the server SHOULD
send the same header fields in response to HEAD as it would for GET,
except that payload headers MAY be omitted. Cont
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:57 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:57 PM bm1les wrote:
> >
> > > --- netstart2 Sep 2021 19:38:20 - 1.216
> > > +++ netstart8 Oct 2021 02:43:30 -
> > > @@ -365,7 +3
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:57 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:57 PM bm1les wrote:
> >
> > > --- netstart2 Sep 2021 19:38:20 - 1.216
> > > +++ netstart8 Oct 2021 02:43:30 -
> > > @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ ifmstart "tun tap gif etherip
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:57 PM bm1les wrote:
>
> > --- netstart2 Sep 2021 19:38:20 - 1.216
> > +++ netstart8 Oct 2021 02:43:30 -
> > @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ ifmstart "tun tap gif etherip gre egre p
> > if [[ $ip6kernel == YES ]]; then
> > # En
Index: bsd.port.mk.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
retrieving revision 1.545
diff -u -p -r1.545 bsd.port.mk.5
--- bsd.port.mk.5 2 May 2021 06:13:57 - 1.545
+++ bsd.port.mk.5 8 Oct 2021 00:0
Could someone "do it", please? ;^)
Regards,
Raf
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:13:16PM BST, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> do it
>
> Raf Czlonka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:50:01PM BST, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Outside of X509_* functions, filenames, openssl(1) commands, e
I can see from the Ubuntu dmesg that it’s Xen 4.11.4. What mode are you
running the OpenBSD vm in (PVH or HVM)? Provide your config file for the vm to
help answer that.
> On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:41 AM, Masato Asou wrote:
>
> Attached obsd69-dmesg.txt and ubuntu-dmesg.txt.
>
> regards.
> --
>
ha...@sdf.org wrote:
> Index: bsd.port.mk.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
> retrieving revision 1.545
> diff -u -p -r1.545 bsd.port.mk.5
> --- bsd.port.mk.5 2 May 2021 06:13:57 - 1.545
> +++ bs
This patch removes code which is only required for running with older
firmware versions (older than -63). This will make it easier to add
new features, such as 40MHz support. Some code removed here would
otherwise need to be updated as well, which is pointless extra work.
I have tested on AX200/AX
Since you obviously care enough to reply and wonder about what I'm doing, I can
happily let you know.
I was trying to configure the network while running bsd.rd. I figured I could
reuse netstart when I spotted this bug.
The bug is that the second part of the expression breaks when sysctl return
The first problem is the lack of correctness; that should be enough.
The second problem is that such command actually breaks when run using bsd.rd.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 8th, 2021 at 12:11 AM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:57 PM bm1les wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:50:01PM BST, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Outside of X509_* functions, filenames, openssl(1) commands, etc.
> there are places where the spelling of 'X.509' could be made
> consistent when talking about the standard.
I realise the patch might have been too long so ho
Before roaming to another AP we should explicitly stop Rx BA sessions
by sending the appropriate 'ADD_STA' commands to firmware, in addition
to clearing Rx BA buffers. This is similar to a recent change in iwm(4).
See the iwm patch description for testing instructions:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-
16 matches
Mail list logo