Re: less: tighten pledge in secure mode

2021-09-22 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Tobias Stoeckmann(tob...@stoeckmann.org) on 2021.09.21 22:23:55 +0200: > Hi, > > upstream (greenwood) less has disabled history file support for secure > mode, i.e. LESSSECURE=1: https://github.com/gwsw/less/pull/201 > > The problem was about permanent marks for which we do not have support > any

Re: smtpd: srs and ruleset evaluation

2021-09-22 Thread Gilles CHEHADE
Hello, As discussed, this looks correct to me > On 22 Sep 2021, at 15:46, Eric Faurot wrote: > > Hi. > > A user reported that decoded SRS addresses are not correctly evaluated > against the ruleset. That's because the ruleset always matches against > the expanded address ("dest") and not the

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-09-22 Thread Patrick Harper
If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified disk requirements, I guess since anyone who owns an amd64 system will very likely be using a disk big enough for X, so I figured that the same would apply

Re: smtpd: srs and ruleset evaluation

2021-09-22 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:46:13 +0200, Eric Faurot wrote: > A user reported that decoded SRS addresses are not correctly evaluated > against the ruleset. That's because the ruleset always matches against > the expanded address ("dest") and not the original address ("rcpt"). > This diff should fix it.

smtpd: srs and ruleset evaluation

2021-09-22 Thread Eric Faurot
Hi. A user reported that decoded SRS addresses are not correctly evaluated against the ruleset. That's because the ruleset always matches against the expanded address ("dest") and not the original address ("rcpt"). This diff should fix it. Eric. Index: lka_session.c

bgpctl mrtdump adjustment

2021-09-22 Thread Claudio Jeker
In bgpd we do not follow the RFC8050 encoding for RIB_GENERIC_ADDPATH. Mainly because it does not fit the way the code works and also because the only other BGP implementation that seems to care about RIB_GENERIC_ADDPATH does it the same way. Because of this it makes no sense to parse RIB_GENERIC_

Re: pf.conf(5) & reply-to

2021-09-22 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:38:14AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/09/22 11:28, Landry Breuil wrote: > > Le Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:40:12PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit a ?crit : > > > Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2021.09.21 22:34:09 +0200: > > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:54:5

Re: pf.conf(5) & reply-to

2021-09-22 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:28:21AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > Le Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:40:12PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit a ?crit : > > Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2021.09.21 22:34:09 +0200: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:54:58PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > did i screwup

Re: pf.conf(5) & reply-to

2021-09-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/22 11:28, Landry Breuil wrote: > Le Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:40:12PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit a écrit : > > Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2021.09.21 22:34:09 +0200: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:54:58PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > did i screwup something somewhere

Re: pf.conf(5) & reply-to

2021-09-22 Thread Landry Breuil
Le Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:40:12PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit a écrit : > Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2021.09.21 22:34:09 +0200: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:54:58PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > did i screwup something somewhere in my config and there's a better way > > > for th

Re: ksh(1) search-history fix

2021-09-22 Thread Theo Buehler
> I suggest that entering a NUL character will abort the search-history > mode, much like ^[ does. This leaves the handling of said character to > the "ordinary" command editing. Makes sense. In vi mode, this problem doesn't occur, as the ^@ is displayed in the search string. ok tb for after re