On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 07:47:36AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 03:01:37PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:44:51AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > There doesn't seem to be a good reason for omitting the newlines here.
> > > If those are ever hit,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 03:01:37PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:44:51AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > There doesn't seem to be a good reason for omitting the newlines here.
> > If those are ever hit, it will look odd. Am I missing something?
>
> See the i386 p3_get_bus
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:44:51AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a good reason for omitting the newlines here.
> If those are ever hit, it will look odd. Am I missing something?
See the i386 p3_get_bus_clock() which is where this came from.
i386 prints the msr value and a n
There doesn't seem to be a good reason for omitting the newlines here.
If those are ever hit, it will look odd. Am I missing something?
Index: est.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/est.c,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > ok gerhard@
>
> Thanks for reporting, for the initial patch, and for checking the
> final one. This now committed.
>
> Yours,
> Ingo
Thanks to all for working together and getting this fixed.
Bryan
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:17:27PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:22:18PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > > Although I did not obverve it, there seems to be the same problem
> > > for snd_wl1 and rcv_up. For rcv_up I copied the comparison with
> > > rcv_nx
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 18:50:10 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> in its current state, the editline(3) library is completely unfit
> to work with non-blocking I/O. Neither the API nor the implementation
> are even designed for that purpose.
>
> Consequently, i propose that we document the facts up fron
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:59 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/08/11 19:34, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2021/08/11 16:35, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > > Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmp
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:59 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/08/11 19:34, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2021/08/11 16:35, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > > Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmp
On 2021/08/11 19:34, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021/08/11 16:35, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmpv3
> > > by default. This is also what net-snmp does. I originally
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:50 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in its current state, the editline(3) library is completely unfit
> to work with non-blocking I/O. Neither the API nor the implementation
> are even designed for that purpose.
>
> I do have some candidate ideas to minimally extend
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/08/11 16:35, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmpv3
> > by default. This is also what net-snmp does. I originally chose this
> > default because that's what snmpctl did
On 2021/08/11 16:35, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmpv3
> by default. This is also what net-snmp does. I originally chose this
> default because that's what snmpctl did and it allowed for easier
> interoperability with snmpd(8).
v3 by
Hi,
in its current state, the editline(3) library is completely unfit
to work with non-blocking I/O. Neither the API nor the implementation
are even designed for that purpose.
I do have some candidate ideas to minimally extend the API - without
adding any new functions - to also work with non-bl
Hi,
Here a diff for www page: errata69
Typo errors
Right?
Index: errata69.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/errata69.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 errata69.html
--- errata69.html 10 Aug 2021 18:48:57 -
Probably not something many people will run into.
$ snmp mibtree -q
snmp: unknown option -- q
usage: snmp mibtree[-O fnS] [oid ...]
$ ./obj/snmp mibtree -q
snmp: unknown option -- q
usage: snmp mibtree [-O fnS] [oid ...]
mibtree is the only one not setting the usecommonopt.
OK?
martijn@
Index:
Following snmpd, remove the public default community and move to snmpv3
by default. This is also what net-snmp does. I originally chose this
default because that's what snmpctl did and it allowed for easier
interoperability with snmpd(8).
Now that snmpd(8) moved on, so should snmp(1).
OK?
martijn
Hi,
> ok gerhard@
Thanks for reporting, for the initial patch, and for checking the
final one. This now committed.
Yours,
Ingo
>> Index: date.c
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/date/date.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.56
>> diff
18 matches
Mail list logo