Re: Adjust url of SD Association in comment in sdhc.c

2021-06-12 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 05:41:32AM +0200, Felix Kronlage-Dammers wrote: > hi, > > the legit URL of the SD Associations is www.sdcard.org, not > www.sdcard.com. > > felix > thanks, committed > > > Index: sys/dev/sdmmc/sdhc.c > ==

recvmsg returns MSG_DONTWAIT

2021-06-12 Thread Greg Steuck
I started with a failing test for Haskell network package on 6.9-current amd64 (cabal get network-3.1.2.1 && cabal v2-test) network-3.1.2.1/build/spec/spec --match "/Network.Socket.ByteString/recvMsg/works well/" tests/Network/Socket/ByteStringSpec.hs:209:21: 1) Network.Socket.ByteString.re

Adjust url of SD Association in comment in sdhc.c

2021-06-12 Thread Felix Kronlage-Dammers
hi, the legit URL of the SD Associations is www.sdcard.org, not www.sdcard.com. felix Index: sys/dev/sdmmc/sdhc.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/sdmmc/sdhc.c,v retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -p -u -r1.69 sdhc.c --- sys/dev/sdmmc

Re: add table_procexec in smtpd

2021-06-12 Thread Gilles CHEHADE
Re-sending, I forgot to cc: aisha & tech: > On 12 Jun 2021, at 22:47, Gilles CHEHADE wrote: > >> >> On 12 Jun 2021, at 15:15, Eric Faurot wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds table_pr

Re: add table_procexec in smtpd

2021-06-12 Thread Gilles CHEHADE
> On 12 Jun 2021, at 18:57, Aisha Tammy wrote: > > On 6/12/21 9:15 AM, Eric Faurot wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds >>> table_procexec as the default backend when no backend name ma

Re: upgrade pixman to version 0.40

2021-06-12 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi again, On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:47:16 +0200 Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Hi, > > the patch below updates the pixman library to version 0.40. > > To test, apply the patch in $XSRCDIR/lib/pixman using > > patch -p0 -E < /this/patch > > and the rebuild xenocara according to release(8). > It builds

Re: cwm: Exclude ignored windows from search menu

2021-06-12 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:41:05PM +0200, Leon Fischer wrote: > There is no use in listing ignored windows, which are generally used as > for "status bars", in the window search menu (M-slash). It clutters up > the menu with persistent windows that the user would very rarely want > to focus. `M-/f

Re: add table_procexec in smtpd

2021-06-12 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 6/12/21 9:15 AM, Eric Faurot wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote: Hi, Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds table_procexec as the default backend when no backend name matches. Hi. I'm not opposed to the idea, but I have a couple of c

cwm: Exclude ignored windows from search menu

2021-06-12 Thread Leon Fischer
There is no use in listing ignored windows, which are generally used as for "status bars", in the window search menu (M-slash). It clutters up the menu with persistent windows that the user would very rarely want to focus. This patch excludes them from menu-window and menu-window-hidden. They can

Re: fix isascii(3) manpage

2021-06-12 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:56:20AM +, Miod Vallat wrote: > All the is*() ctype.h functions take an int as argument, but valid > values are only EOF, and the range of values of `unsigned char'. > > All, but one: the XPG4 isascii(), which has no such restriction. > Quoting https://pubs.opengroup

Re: add table_procexec in smtpd

2021-06-12 Thread Eric Faurot
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote: > Hi, > Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds table_procexec > as the default backend when no backend name matches. > Hi. I'm not opposed to the idea, but I have a couple of comments: First, if the two implemen

Re: ifnewlladdr spl

2021-06-12 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
Is it expected interrupt handlers modify ifp->if_flags? > On 10 Jun 2021, at 20:17, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > Hi, > > I have seen this crash trace on a 6.6 based system, but I think the > bug exists still in -current. It happened when an ixl(4) interface > was removed from trunk(4). > > uvm_