Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:54:36 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Does anybody please review my code?
>
> Yasuoka-san is my coleague of my work.
> So, he is interested in this topic. That’s why I CCed this mail.
> I don’t mean he is an reviewer.
>
>> 2021/01/12 11:27、Yuichiro NAITO のメール:
>> I have
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:41:15AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below moves `access_type' to the context structure passed down to
> the various routines and fix a regression introduced in a previous
> refactoring.
>
> `access_type' is overwritten for wired mapping and the value of
> `enter
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:21:14PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:48:33AM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 05:41:24PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:27:38 -0600
> > > > From: Scott Cheloha
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 0
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:52:22PM -0600, Dale Rahn wrote:
> The 'magic' here was that MD code could choose to implement statclock (and
> set stathz appropriately), or MD code could not care about the multiple
> statclock/hardclock interfaces into the scheduler. Also some clock drivers
> on a platf
Does anybody please review my code?
Yasuoka-san is my coleague of my work.
So, he is interested in this topic. That’s why I CCed this mail.
I don’t mean he is an reviewer.
> 2021/01/12 11:27、Yuichiro NAITO のメール:
>
>
> Hi.
>
> I have set up multiple peers in a wg0 interface,
> and tried to remo
Subj. It's integer so assignments are atomic.
Index: sys/sys/proc.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/proc.h,v
retrieving revision 1.304
diff -u -p -r1.304 proc.h
--- sys/sys/proc.h 11 Jan 2021 13:55:53 - 1.304
+++ sys/sys/
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:10:25PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 02/01/21(Sat) 21:54, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > This allows us to unlock getppid(2). Also NetBSD, DragonflyBSD and OSX
> > do the same.
>
> Seems the way to go, two comments below.
>
> > @@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ process_reparent(s
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2021.01.13 13:10:23 +0100:
> This is another cleanup round of the route decision process.
> This time focusing on prefix_cmp(). Make sure that when using
> return (a - b) that the results always fits in an int type.
> Also make sure the check of the remote
Errata patches for the kernel have been released for OpenBSD 6.8.
Use of bpf(4) on a carp interface could result in a use after free
error.
Binary updates for the amd64, i386, and arm64 platforms are available via
the syspatch utility. Source code patches can be found on the respective
errata pag
On 02/01/21(Sat) 21:54, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This allows us to unlock getppid(2). Also NetBSD, DragonflyBSD and OSX
> do the same.
Seems the way to go, two comments below.
> Index: kern/exec_elf.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys
This is another cleanup round of the route decision process.
This time focusing on prefix_cmp(). Make sure that when using
return (a - b) that the results always fits in an int type.
Also make sure the check of the remote_addr at the end is done
properly. The result is probably the same but this is
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:24:32AM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:39:02PM +0100, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> > This diff changes two things:
> > - First, it move the kroute update into rde_generate_updates() simplifying
> > prefix_evaluate a little bit.
> >
> > - Second, it
Le Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:39:02PM +0100, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> This diff changes two things:
> - First, it move the kroute update into rde_generate_updates() simplifying
> prefix_evaluate a little bit.
>
> - Second, it changes prefix_evaluate to take an additional argument for the
> old prefi
13 matches
Mail list logo
