Re: [PATCH] Make cat(1) and split(1) reference each other

Donovan Watteau wrote: > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I disagree with this. > > > > Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"... > > That's not my personal intent no, but I get your point. > > concatenating/splitting are exact complementary actions, so I thought > t

Re: [PATCH] Make cat(1) and split(1) reference each other

Theo de Raadt wrote: > I disagree with this. > > Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"... That's not my personal intent no, but I get your point. concatenating/splitting are exact complementary actions, so I thought this section would accept cross-references i

Re: [PATCH] Make cat(1) and split(1) reference each other

I disagree with this. Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"... Donovan Watteau wrote: > Hi, > > Ten years ago, a teacher of mine asked why "the command which > concatenates files never mentions the command which splits files". > > Ten years later, I still t

[PATCH] Make cat(1) and split(1) reference each other

Hi, Ten years ago, a teacher of mine asked why "the command which concatenates files never mentions the command which splits files". Ten years later, I still think he made a good point, so here's a diff. If there's a reason for things to be the way they are, I'm still curious to learn it :) Dono

Re: unwind(8): tcp transport

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:44:41PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote: > This is on top of the "unwind(8): respect DO flag" diff I just sent to > tech. > > This is a bit rough around the edges, but if you feel lucky... > > Currently unwind(8) only accepts queries over udp. We can get away > with that sin

Re: unwind(8): respect DO flag

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote: > Rewrite query parsing and answer formating using libunbound provided > functions. > With this we can filter out DNSSEC RRsets if the client did not ask > for them. > We will also be able to send truncated answers to indicate to the >

Re: [PATCH] Reduce case duplication in kern_sysctl

On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 14:39:53 -0800 Greg Steuck wrote: > Thanks for the reviews! > > Marcus Glocker writes: > > > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 22:09:06 +0100 > > Marcus Glocker wrote: > > If you could fix the switch() indentation in a separate commit (as > > you already mentioned in one of your previous