On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:15:13 -0800
Greg Steuck wrote:
> George Koehler writes:
>
> > If I do ddb set a bad value, then sysctl refuses to show the value:
> >
> > # sysctl ddb.console=1
> > ddb.console: 0 -> 1
> > # sysctl ddb.trigger=1
> > Stopped at ddb_sysctl+0x114:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:04:58PM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
Sorry, duplicate, disconsider since I sent it again just to find out I had no
rDNS.
--
db
Hi tech@,
I have a FT232H variant (marked FT232HQ, 0403:6014) which works with uftdi(4).
Still related to uftdi(4), sys/dev/usb/ftdi.c has a comment saying uftdi(4)
does not support multiple serial ports because ucom(4), but I'm able to use
both ucom(4) in parallel from a FT2232H (dual).
Thank y
Hi tech@,
I have a FT232H variant (marked FT232HQ, 0403:6014) which works with uftdi(4).
Still related to uftdi(4), sys/dev/usb/ftdi.c has a comment saying uftdi(4)
does not support multiple serial ports because ucom(4), but I'm able to use
both ucom(4) in parallel from the same FT2232H (dual).
ok gkoehler@ with one comment change, see below.
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:36:58 -0800
Greg Steuck wrote:
> diff --git sys/net/if_gre.c sys/net/if_gre.c
> index cb5beeaad62..deacad9c755 100644
> --- sys/net/if_gre.c
> +++ sys/net/if_gre.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ gre_input_key(struct mbuf **mp, int
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:49:27PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is another diff that should fix associating with
> some APs that currently don't work.
>
> If block ack is active and the first frame got lost,
> subsequent packets are held back until a timeout expires.
> When this tim
Hi,
here is another diff that should fix associating with
some APs that currently don't work.
If block ack is active and the first frame got lost,
subsequent packets are held back until a timeout expires.
When this timeout expires, the gap at the start of the
reorder buffer is skipped and subsequ
On 08/12/20(Tue) 22:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:15:50PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Getting a page from the fault handler might require poking at some
> > swap-related states.
> >
> > These are not in the hot-path of the fault handler so for the moment
> > just a
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:25:00PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Simple diff below to add the rw_lock_held() as well as a read & write
> version.
>
> This allows us to reduce the difference with NetBSD in UVM by adding the
> following checks:
>
> KASSERT(rw_write_held(amap->am_lock));
>
On 2020/12/07 22:54, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:43:32PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > From: "Constantine A. Murenin"
> > > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:04:52 -0800
> > >
> > > Not sure if you've seen it, but ipmi(4) has been disabled for over 12
> > > years, because it's br
Diff below aims to simplify the API to put a thread on a sleep queue and
reduce it to the following:
sleep_setup();
/* check condition or release lock */
sleep_finish();
It is motivated by my work to sleep the SCHED_LOCK() but might as well
prevent/fix some bugs.
The tric
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:15:50PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Getting a page from the fault handler might require poking at some
> swap-related states.
>
> These are not in the hot-path of the fault handler so for the moment
> just assert that the KERNEL_LOCK() is held or grab it if the funct
On 08/12/20(Tue) 11:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:18:41 -0300
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> [,..]
> > Index: kern/kern_event.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.146
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:08:46PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below rewrites uvm_fault() using a loop.
>
> I added a KERNEL_LOCK/UNLOCK() dance around the part that won't be
> unlocked soon to illustrate where this is going.
>
> ok?
I'm also ok with this.
Total bikesheed, but I would
> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:18:41 -0300
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Diff below adds a per-thread kqueue that will be initialized during the
> first select(2) or poll(2) syscall and freed upon exit.
>
> Along with this queue a per-thread serial number is used to check the
> integrity of events enq
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:08:46PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below rewrites uvm_fault() using a loop.
>
> I added a KERNEL_LOCK/UNLOCK() dance around the part that won't be
> unlocked soon to illustrate where this is going.
>
> ok?
yes, ok jmatthew@
>
> Index: uvm/uvm_fault.c
>
On 2020/12/08 10:26, Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> The inner packet destination address is written in the encapsulated packet and
> the final address to be delivered.
> The outer packet destination address is peer address of IPsec tunnel.
>
> Do you mean that I have to set the routing table entry for th
17 matches
Mail list logo