Hi Daniel,
my OK still stands, except that you went too far in one respect
in the manual page, see below.
Yours,
Ingo
Daniel Jakots wrote on Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:41:31PM -0400:
> Index: share/man/man8/daily.8
> ===
> RCS file
This lacks diffs for MAKEDEV and other files. We need to see
those.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:48 PM Andrew Daugherity
wrote:
> With a headless machine, the installer always uses MBR mode. I selected GPT
> and ignored the warning "An EFI/GPT disk may not boot. Proceed?"; it boots
> fine, of course (and MBR mode would not boot, unless I manually created and
> popul
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 12:19:35PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I'd like to get this in early in this release cycle, so please test and
> report back :o)
You removed the resleep logic that accounts for if/when tsleep_nsec(9)
returns early. So now select and pselect can return too
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 22:47:43 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> That is OK with me, but you need to remove all mentions:
>
> $ man -k any=VERBOSESTATUS
> afterboot(8) - things to check after the first complete boot
> daily, monthly, weekly(8) - periodic system maintenance
Indeed, th
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:41:31PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:04:20 +0200, Ingo Schwarze
> wrote:
>
> > I certainly like this, and it works for me.
> >
> > But i think a change like this would need more than one OK,
> > and you should wait some days such that developers
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:04:20 +0200, Ingo Schwarze
wrote:
> I certainly like this, and it works for me.
>
> But i think a change like this would need more than one OK,
> and you should wait some days such that developers can raise
> objections.
Yes, of course.
> Just in case you get sufficient O
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:05:51PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> Gerhard Roth provided a patch to me to get the Qualcomm Snapdragon X20
> umb(4) interface in my Dell Latitude 7300 working. It is also known as a
> Dell DW5821e interface. I have been using this patch for months now with
> AT&T Wir
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Jakots wrote on Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:16:57PM -0400:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 19:55:53 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Daniel Jakots wrote on Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:32:31PM -0400:
>>> Currently daily(8) runs `df -ikl`.
>> By default, it does not. It only does that if you set V
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 19:55:53 +0200, Ingo Schwarze
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Jakots wrote on Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:32:31PM -0400:
>
> > Currently daily(8) runs `df -ikl`.
>
> By default, it does not. It only does that if you set VERBOSESTATUS.
Are you sure? It looks like it does not, *if* yo
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 07:55:53PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Daniel Jakots wrote on Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:32:31PM -0400:
> > Currently daily(8) runs `df -ikl`.
> By default, it does not. It only does that if you set VERBOSESTATUS.
Actually, it does do it by default. One needs to set VERB
Hi,
Daniel Jakots wrote on Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:32:31PM -0400:
> Currently daily(8) runs `df -ikl`.
By default, it does not. It only does that if you set VERBOSESTATUS.
I would prefer deleting the VERBOSESTATUS parts completely,
strictly enforcing the principle "daily(8) only produces outpu
Diff below modifies the internal implementation of {p,}select(2) to
query kqfilter handlers instead of poll ones.
I deliberately left {p,}poll(2) untouched to ease the transition.
This diff includes some kqueue refactoring from visa@. It is built on
top of the changes that went in during the las
On 01/10/20(Thu) 21:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:10:56 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > While studying a bug report from naddy@ in 2017 when testing guenther@'s
> > amap/anon locking diff I figured out that we have been too optimistic in
> > the !MAP_ANON case.
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
