Hello,
This patch adds two new options to sysupgrade. The first option is for small
box systems like an APU system that only has the base and manual sets
installed. The second option is for headless systems without X11 like servers.
I have tested this patch from the 6.5 release to 6.6 release t
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:31:12 -0400
> From: George Koehler
>
> Moving from bugs@ to tech@,
> because some people might miss a clang diff on bugs@.
>
> This diff modifies LLVM's DAGCombiner to skip an optimization if it
> would make an illegal ISD::ADDE node. This fixes fatal errors from
> p
OK to add this?
Index: release.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/release.8,v
retrieving revision 1.94
diff -u -p -r1.94 release.8
--- release.8 23 Jun 2018 23:19:11 - 1.94
+++ release.8 29 Apr 2020 13:44:19 -
@@
On 2020/04/29 11:58, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb
> stick) with consequences.
> With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no problem
> as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx.
> Sorry, I really should know usin
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:58:55AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb
> stick) with consequences.
> With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no problem
> as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx.
> Sorry, I r
Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb
stick) with consequences.
With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no
problem as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx.
Sorry, I really should know using latest -current only, but I learnt not
using an
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:26:51PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> >
> > > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod:
> >
> > Nope. _sniop is the correct name. Th
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote:
>
> > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod:
>
> Nope. _sniop is the correct name. The real issue is that that group isn't in
> the /etc/group file used during in
On 2020/04/29 10:28, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod:
>
> During fresh install from install.fs amd64 of OpenBSD 6.7-beta (GENERIC.MP)
> #163: Tue Apr 28 21:35:13 MDT 2020
You are showing the version of the installed GENERIC.MP kernel not the
install image.
I th
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod:
Nope. _sniop is the correct name. The real issue is that that group isn't in
the /etc/group file used during install.
How that can happen I do not know yet.
-Otto
>
> During f
Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod:
During fresh install from install.fs amd64 of OpenBSD 6.7-beta
(GENERIC.MP) #163: Tue Apr 28 21:35:13 MDT 2020
...
Making all device nodes...chgrp: group is invalid: _sndiop
chgrp: group is invalid: _sndiop
done.
Multiprocessor machine; using bsd.m
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:27:00 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:16:43PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on my i.MX8MM EVK there's a ath10k-based WiFi chip which we
> > unfortunately do not support (yet?). But the SD/MMC CIS parser
> > complains:
> >
> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
