Re: top(1) CPU field width diff

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Piotr Durlej wrote: > Hello, > > the following top(1) patch allows for printing CPU percentages >=100% > without overflowing the CPU column width. > > https://www.durlej.net/diff/top.diff > > Regards, > Piotr Durlej > Please post diffs inline. Also, y

Re: openssl.1: Tag command names

Hi Klemens, Ingo Schwarze wrote on Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:30:53PM +0100: > While i don't strongly object to the patch, it might be worth holding > off a bit on manually tagging of .Sh given that even automatic > tagging isn't done for that macro yet. Which would mean postponing > this patch unt

top(1) CPU field width diff

Hello, the following top(1) patch allows for printing CPU percentages >=100% without overflowing the CPU column width. https://www.durlej.net/diff/top.diff Regards, Piotr Durlej

Re: diff: init efifb even if VGA is probed.

On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:23:41 +1100 Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 07:06:50PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:50:54 +0900 (JST) >> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:02:48 +1100 >> > Jonathan Gray wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:09

Re: diff: init efifb even if VGA is probed.

On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:47:51 +0100 (CET) Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:50:54 +0900 (JST) >> From: YASUOKA Masahiko >> >> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:02:48 +1100 >> Jonathan Gray wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:09:07PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> >> When efiboot start

Re: snmpd(8) remove OID CONFIGURATION

> Am 27.02.2020 um 08:56 schrieb Martijn van Duren > : > > On 2/12/20 7:48 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote: >> Hello tech@, >> >> Working on something else, this bit of code is somewhat in my way and it >> feels like an early testing feature instead of actually being useful. >> It wasn’t an ear