ping.
On 2/15/20 12:33 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> This diff does the following:
> - Push the network handling to their own files.
> This helps with readability and allows for easier addition of other
> transport layers if we ever choose to (unix socket, ssh, dtls, ...)
> - Allow multiple t
ping
On 2/17/20 8:19 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 2/17/20 8:12 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> jan@ found some issues with this diff during u2k20.
>> Here's an updated diff. Changes since previous diff are:
>> - If we don't know the protocol yet, we can't assume a port is
>> specified.
>> -
On 2/12/20 7:48 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Working on something else, this bit of code is somewhat in my way and it
> feels like an early testing feature instead of actually being useful.
>
> Is anyone actually using this, or can it be removed?
>
> martijn@
>
One reply so f
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 06:34:40PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > Here the patch is broken.
> > patch: malformed patch at line 906: /VERS+use strict;
>
> Attached again, not sure how it got broken. Also can be downloaded from:
> http://cvs.afresh1.com/~andrew/Term-ReadKey-2.38.patch
The
Hi Klemens,
Ingo Schwarze wrote on Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:30:53PM +0100:
> Klemens Nanni wrote on Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:19:27PM +0100:
>> Patch was done with a VIM macro by adding a new line after each `.Sh'
>> line with the respective name but lowercased, so no typos in the added
>> strings.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:33:19AM GMT, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:15:34AM +, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:13:02PM GMT, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > +++ lib/libsndio/sioctl_aucat.c 8 Feb 2020 14:49:37 -
> > > [...]
> > > + * Copyright (c)
Due to the design of the IKEv2 protocol, the receiver does not
know which policy the initiator tries to negotiate an SA for
until the second exchange (IKE_AUTH). The IKE_AUTH request contains
the ID payload which the responder uses to match a policy (and lookup
authentication keys).
Until then, ike
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:33:54PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> I tested with a 7260 and a 8260, patrick@ tested the diff on his 9260.
That's good enough coverage. ok stsp@
> diff --git a/sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c b/sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c
> index 2a276915cfe..66e6ad25ba2 100644
> --- a/sys/dev/pci/if_
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 03:07:47PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:06:31PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to figure out the reason for the lost Tx receive interrupt
> > by comparing iwm with iwlwifi and I think our handling of the
> > periodic RX int
