Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 03:23:51AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > drop the _PCIE and just have
> > >
> > > product SYMBIOS SSS6200
> > Sure enough. I added it in analogy to other devices. What is th
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 03:23:51AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > drop the _PCIE and just have
> >
> > product SYMBIOS SSS6200
> Sure enough. I added it in analogy to other devices. What is the rule
> here for such suffix? Only w
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> drop the _PCIE and just have
>
> product SYMBIOS SSS6200
Sure enough. I added it in analogy to other devices. What is the rule
here for such suffix? Only when the same product/chip is available
as PCI *and* PCIE model or so?
Ind
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 02:35:39AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 11:10:28AM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > It'd be better to use the LSI chip name for this, which is SSS6200. There
> > are
> > other devices with different flash configurations using the same
> > vendor
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 11:10:28AM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> It'd be better to use the LSI chip name for this, which is SSS6200. There are
> other devices with different flash configurations using the same
> vendor/product
> ID. Searching ebay for 'lsi nytro' or 'lsi sss6200' will find a
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:54:56PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > +product SYMBIOS F80_PCIE 0x007e Flash Accelerator F80 800GB eMLC
>
> Please keep it short, these strings land in every kernel.
>
> F80 eMLC
>
> That is probably enough, on top of SYMBIOS vendorID.
It'd be better to use t
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:54:56PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Please keep it short, these strings land in every kernel.
>
> F80 eMLC
>
> That is probably enough, on top of SYMBIOS vendorID.
Sure, OK like that or should the define's "_PCIE" suffix go as well?
Index: mpii.c
> +product SYMBIOS F80_PCIE 0x007e Flash Accelerator F80 800GB eMLC
Please keep it short, these strings land in every kernel.
F80 eMLC
That is probably enough, on top of SYMBIOS vendorID.
vendor "Symbios Logic", unknown product 0x007e (class mass storage
subclass SAS, rev 0x03) at pci19 dev 0 function 0 not configured
Such devices can be found on SPARC T4 machines, they are eMLC flash
accelerator cards.
After looking into mpii(4) and jmatthew guessing that attaching them
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:02:37PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Refactor link state ack/req in ospf6d so it looks closer to ospfd.
ok remi@
> Index: lsack.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/lsack.c,v
> retrieving revision
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:46:56AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Looks like WWID for the RAID volume can be read from the RAID Volume
> Page 1 (mpii_cfg_raid_vol_pg1).
jmatthew also suggested that, thanks.
I'm looking into now mpii(4) and already had a rather naive attempt at
setting the SCSI tar
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 08:42:20AM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
> +1 on max Len , keep \0, use length - 1 for sum.
SSIDs are not strings.
+1 on max Len , keep \0, use length - 1 for sum.
IMHO.
Happy holidays all.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 7:39 AM Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > If an SSID uses the maximum allowed length, ifconfig overwrites
> > the last byte with \0 when
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> If an SSID uses the maximum allowed length, ifconfig overwrites
> the last byte with \0 when hashing the WPA key.
> This leads to a wrong WPA key being installed in the kernel:
>
> iwm0: SCAN -> AUTH
> iwm0: sending auth to xx:xx:x
If an SSID uses the maximum allowed length, ifconfig overwrites
the last byte with \0 when hashing the WPA key.
This leads to a wrong WPA key being installed in the kernel:
iwm0: SCAN -> AUTH
iwm0: sending auth to xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx on channel 1 mode 11g
iwm0: AUTH -> ASSOC
iwm0: sending assoc_req
Klemens Nanni writes:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Well, there's your problem. The mpii(4) doesn't fill in the WWNs for
>> the logical volume so there is nothing that can be matched to the WWN
>> from the bootpath.
> Obvious now that you mention it.
>
>> >
16 matches
Mail list logo