While we don't have C11's quick_exit() we do have timespec_get() and
struct timespec/aligned_alloc().
Index: include/__config
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libcxx/include/__config,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 __config
--- i
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:16:43PM -0800, Pratik Vyas wrote:
> * Pratik Vyas [2019-11-24 23:07:26 -0800]:
>
> > Hello tech@,
> >
> > This diff attaches pvclock with lower priority (500) in case of unstable
> > tsc (PVCLOCK_FLAG_TSC_STABLE) instead of not attaching at all.
> >
> > For reference
* Pratik Vyas [2019-11-24 23:07:26 -0800]:
Hello tech@,
This diff attaches pvclock with lower priority (500) in case of unstable
tsc (PVCLOCK_FLAG_TSC_STABLE) instead of not attaching at all.
For reference current priorities,
tsc (variant) : -2000
i8254 : 0
acpitimer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Following cleanup diff:
>
> - reduces gratuitous differences with NetBSD,
> - merges multiple '#ifdef _KERNEL' blocks,
> - kills unused 'struct vm_map_intrsafe'
> - turns 'union vm_map_object' into a anonymous union (following to N
The parse_size() wrapper around scan_scaled(3) writes its intermediate
result to the function argument which is always passed as literal zero.
This seems odd, the function parameter has no meaning but merely serves
as storage, so let's use a proper function scoped variable instead.
OK?
Index: m
The output processing in bgpctl is not very extensible. And output flags
like ssv have to hacked into the output in a bad way.
This is the first bit of a much bigger shuffling action to make the output
handling more extensible. For now this just moves the header and body
generation into two functi
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 12:16:09PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) on 2019.12.06 15:14:42 +1000:
> >
> >
> > > On 5 Dec 2019, at 21:14, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > >
> > > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
> > >> I would sugg
David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) on 2019.12.06 15:14:42 +1000:
>
>
> > On 5 Dec 2019, at 21:14, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >
> > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
> >> I would suggest to just pack most of the headers into one group of ().
> >>
> >> IPv4 ttl 1
On 2019/12/06 15:14, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 5 Dec 2019, at 21:14, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >
> > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
> >> I would suggest to just pack most of the headers into one group of ().
> >>
> >> IPv4 ttl 1 [tos 0x20] 10.0.127.1
