Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Also, just count how many spaces we need to print ncpuonline,
> > then use that when printing the individual CPU lines.
> Yup, here's a minimal diff that does that without additional buffers and
> globals but
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Also, just count how many spaces we need to print ncpuonline,
> then use that when printing the individual CPU lines.
Yup, here's a minimal diff that does that without additional buffers and
globals but a single local static padding;
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:52:08 -0500
> > From: Scott Cheloha
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:52:08 -0500
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
> > > Is this bet
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
> > Is this better?
> >
> > 4 CPUs: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0%
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
> Is this better?
>
> 4 CPUs: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100%
> idle
>
> CPU 0 : 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:54:19 +0200
> From: Klemens Nanni
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
> Is this better?
>
> 4 CPUs: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100%
> idle
>
> CP
Hi Krystian,
I started working on integrating this. I fixed some small style
issues (long lines, spaces, redundant braces). From various bits of
documentation and a glance at the Linux driver it seems the list of
prescaling factors is identical for all Allwinner SoCs. So I turned
the array of p
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
> Is this better?
>
> 4 CPUs: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100%
> idle
>
> CPU 0 : 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys,
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I am suggesting you put the spaces after the cpu#.
Is this better?
4 CPUs: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100% idle
CPU 0 : 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100% idle
CPU
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:15:52AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > CPU0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100%
> > idle
> >
> > You've solved an inconsistancy, but choosing spacing like this doesn't make
> > sense to me.
> I could make it al
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:15:52AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> CPU0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100%
> idle
>
> You've solved an inconsistancy, but choosing spacing like this doesn't make
> sense to me.
I could make it always use the minimum amount of spaces
CPU0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% sys, 0.0% spin, 0.0% intr, 100% idle
You've solved an inconsistancy, but choosing spacing like this doesn't make
sense to me.
`top -b -- 3 foo bar' works but should not.
OK?
Index: top.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/top/top.c,v
retrieving revision 1.101
diff -u -p -r1.101 top.c
--- top.c 8 Oct 2019 20:51:03 - 1.101
+++ top.c 12 Oct
Toggling between combined and per CPU statistics always causes the state
values to jump left or right; to make matters worse, if the window is
wider than 80 columns, per CPU lines start with "CPUx states:" instead
of "CPUx:". Examples of all three cases:
4 CPUs: 0.3% user, 0.0% nice, 0.6% s
15 matches
Mail list logo
