On 08/07/19(Mon) 15:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/06/19(Wed) 19:13, Christian Ludwig wrote:
> > We have two variables with the same meaning. db_active is used in way
> > more places, so let's nuke db_is_active.
>
> Thanks for the cleanup!
>
> > Now that db_active is in for a while already a
> On 17 Jul 2019, at 09:44, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 15/07/19(Mon) 15:29, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:21:28 -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>
>>> We have many home brewed ways to check Ethernet addresses. This diff
>>> introduces two macros similar to ETHER_IS_MULTICA
On 16/07/19(Tue) 22:45, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Convert struct pkpcb malloc(9) to pool_get(9). PCB for pfkey is
> only used in process context, so pass PR_WAITOK to pool_init(9).
> The possible sleep in pool_put(9) should not hurt, as pfkeyv2_detach()
> is only called by soclose(9).
In
On 16/07/19(Tue) 21:35, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When the kernel reaches the sysclt kern.maxclusters limit, operations
> get stuck while holding the net lock. Increasing the limit does
> not help as there is no wakeup of the pools. So run through the
> mbuf pool request list when the lim
On 15/07/19(Mon) 15:29, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:21:28 -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > We have many home brewed ways to check Ethernet addresses. This diff
> > introduces two macros similar to ETHER_IS_MULTICAST() and make use of
> > them in bridge(4) and generic Etherne
Hi,
The function unveil_add_vnode() does not use the parameter rootvnode.
It is even more confusing as rootvnode is also a global variable.
ok?
bluhm
Index: kern/kern_unveil.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/kern/ker
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 02:34:52PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Rebased diff after bluhm's conflicting realpath/POSIX fix.
I have seen a similar problem with immuatble chflags(2).
# rm /etc/hosts
# chflags uchg /etc
# ifconfig vio0
ifconfig: unveil: Operation not permitted
Adding EPERM to the l
Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to find the byte position of a string within a binary file
> using grep. Our base grep -bo let me down because it will only display
> the position of the '\n' delimited line, not the position of the
> pattern.
>
> That's what our grep(1) says:
Hi,
I just tried to find the byte position of a string within a binary file
using grep. Our base grep -bo let me down because it will only display
the position of the '\n' delimited line, not the position of the
pattern.
That's what our grep(1) says:
-b The offset in bytes of a matched patte
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.07.10 22:08:38 +0200:
> This diff is a bit of a monster. It changes the Adj-RIB-Out to be a peer
> specific set of RB trees instead of using a rib in the original sense.
> The reason for this is that the more peers a system has the more elements
> end
Hi,
Convert struct pkpcb malloc(9) to pool_get(9). PCB for pfkey is
only used in process context, so pass PR_WAITOK to pool_init(9).
The possible sleep in pool_put(9) should not hurt, as pfkeyv2_detach()
is only called by soclose(9).
ok?
bluhm
Index: net/pfkeyv2.c
=
Hi,
When the kernel reaches the sysclt kern.maxclusters limit, operations
get stuck while holding the net lock. Increasing the limit does
not help as there is no wakeup of the pools. So run through the
mbuf pool request list when the limit changes.
There seem to more problems when recovering fr
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff is a bit of a monster. It changes the Adj-RIB-Out to be a
> peer specific set of RB trees instead of using a rib in the original
> sense. The reason for this is that the more peers a system has the
> more elements end up bei
Rebased diff after bluhm's conflicting realpath/POSIX fix.
Index: kern/vfs_lookup.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 vfs_lookup.c
--- kern/vfs_lookup.c 15 Jul 2019 14:56:45 -0
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:29:11PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> is there something obvious im missing here? how else do i make the
> backup bridge not transmit to the other DC?
A workaround which does not involve kernel hacking could be to
monitor carp state with ifstated(8) and have it put etheri
this is not a request for oks, this is me backing up a hack i did to fix
a problem i needed a quick solution for.
we're in the process of moving a bunch of boxes to a new site, and are
lucky that we can take our address space with us. to let us gradually
migrate hosts i want to stretch the layer 2
16 matches
Mail list logo
