On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 08:07:48AM +0300, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> ropers writes:
> > Okay, so since nobody else appears to be making any pertinent noise, I
> > guess it falls to me:
> >
> > Index: ed.1
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/b
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 03:27:04PM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I wrote up a tiny unveil(2) wrapper for perl, similar to the pledge(2)
> wrapper we have in tree. It passes the tests I wrote, but it's entirely
> possible I'm doing something terrible wrong.
>
> But, I think it could be useful
Second thought, maybe the 'i.e.'s should be changed to 'e.g.'s,
because '/' and '?' also work (instead of '//' and '??',
respectively), so '/re' and '?re' are indeed only examples.
Or maybe this is overdoing it. I don't know. Whatever you all think is
best and most correct. I have no strong person
mazocomp opined:
> Hi!
>
> I am not good at explaining something shortly and clearly to fit into
> proper documentation, so I'll just describe my experience here.
>
> Terminating regular expressions with / or ? is necessary only if they
> are followed by commands, otherwise the following are legal
I wrote up a tiny unveil(2) wrapper for perl, similar to the pledge(2)
wrapper we have in tree. It passes the tests I wrote, but it's entirely
possible I'm doing something terrible wrong.
But, I think it could be useful, OK to commit, comments?
l8rZ,
--
andrew - http://afresh1.com
Speed matter
In case of errors, wd(4) generally retries transfers after
hz / 2 [ticks] = 500 [ms].
Builds and boots, but (sadly) my PowerBook G4's disk is working fine so
this code has not been triggered.
OK?
Index: dev/ata/wd.c
===
RCS file: /c
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 12:59:55AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below fixes interction between ldomctl(8) and the firmware on
> a SPARC T4 system that I have access to. To make sure that this
> doesn't break other machines it would be good if people could test
> this on a few more ldoms-
