Re: enable pfctl to flush all rules and tables

2019-05-16 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello Klemens, I think what you see is actually somewhat desired/expected behavior of current PF. stay tuned for explanation further below. > > Clean up: > > # ./obj/pfctl -Fa -aregress/* > 0 tables deleted. > rules cleared > 0 tables deleted. > rules cleared >

[PATCH] Provide static_ASN1_*(). From OpenSSL 1.1.0 API.

2019-05-16 Thread Stefan Strogin
--- src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/asn1t.h | 62 ++ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/asn1t.h b/src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/asn1t.h index ba380bdf4..5e229e39d 100644 --- a/src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/asn1t.h +++ b/src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/asn1t.h @@

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-05-16 Thread Remi Locherer
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:39:37AM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > > > > Remi Locherer(remi.loche...@relo.ch) on 2019.05.15 23:15:03 +0200: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:10:37PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:10:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > On 2019/

Re: [1/3] Re: enable pfctl to flush all rules and tables

2019-05-16 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:47:30PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Diff below introduces PF_OPT_IGNFAIL, which optionally relaxes err()/errx() > to warn()/warnx(), where my following changes need that. I have not done > 'global' replace of err()/errx() to pfctl_err()/pfctl_errx() to keep change

Re: enable pfctl to flush all rules and tables

2019-05-16 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > -void > > +int > > pfctl_clear_rules(int dev, int opts, char *anchorname) > > { > > - struct pfr_buffer t; > > + struct pfr_buffer t; > > + int rv = 0; > Not needed... > > > > memset(&t, 0, si

Re: scheduler small changes

2019-05-16 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 16/05/19(Thu) 00:08, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > [...] > > Regarding the choice of deriving quantum from the priority, are you sure > > the priorities are correct? Should we keep priorities? Or if userland > > needs priorities shouldn't we convert quantum into priority and not the > > other way ar

Re: sensorsd(8) unveil for -f option

2019-05-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/05/15 18:11, Theo de Raadt wrote: > That looks good. > > Do others using sensorsd concur? Yes. > Anton Borowka wrote: > > > sensorsd(8) currently only unveils /etc/sensorsd.conf for reading, but > > the config file can be changed with the -f option (which is currently > > not working)

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-05-16 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Remi Locherer(remi.loche...@relo.ch) on 2019.05.15 23:15:03 +0200: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:10:37PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:10:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2019/04/29 11:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > > > > David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) o

Re: mention opensmtpd mail archive on a web page

2019-05-16 Thread Gilles Chehade
sorry, im slowly catching up on my mail backlog diff committed, thanks On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 08:27:56PM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > diff --git a/opensmtpd/list.html b/opensmtpd/list.html > index cdb66803b..97e55d3df 100644 > --- a/opensmtpd/list.html > +++ b/opensmtpd/list.html > @@ -38,7

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-05-16 Thread Denis Fondras
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:15:03PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > Any opinions or comments on this? I think this would be a valuable addition > to ospfd. > I can't see any harm in it. OK denis@ > > > > Below diff changes ospfctl to accept the address and number format for > > "ospfct show datab