Hi Peter,
Peter Piwowarski wrote on Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:03:20PM -0400:
> qsort(3) has in its EXAMPLE a C \n with its backslash unescaped; a quick
> grep through manpages showed similar errors in CONF_modules_load_file.3.
Ouch! Thanks for the report, committed.
Ingo
> Index: lib/libc/std
qsort(3) has in its EXAMPLE a C \n with its backslash unescaped; a quick
grep through manpages showed similar errors in CONF_modules_load_file.3.
Index: lib/libc/stdlib/qsort.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/qsort.3,v
retrievi
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> tested on:
> radeondrm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Radeon HD 3650" rev 0x00
>
> Bug fix release... ok ?
ok jsg@
Tested on i386 with:
radeondrm0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Radeon Mobility M7" rev 0x00
Extended renderer info
tested on:
radeondrm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Radeon HD 3650" rev 0x00
Bug fix release... ok ?
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/driver/xf86-video-ati/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -u -r1.17 ChangeL
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:24:24 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
> I might be blind, but 'grep -r send-mail /usr/ports/pobj/nmh-1.7.1'
> comes up empty for me after 'make extract' in /usr/ports/mail/nmh?
It looks like spost.c is historical code that is not actually packaged
in the distribution (though
On Tue, Mar 19 2019 15:16:10 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:15:17 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
>
> > thanks. that means no need for smtpctl and mailer.conf to check for it
> > any more.
>
> Not so fast. There are still things in ports that use send-mail.
> I haven't grepp
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:15:17 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
> thanks. that means no need for smtpctl and mailer.conf to check for it
> any more.
Not so fast. There are still things in ports that use send-mail.
I haven't grepped the ports tree but the nmh port at least uses
"send-mail" for argv[0]
On Tue, Mar 19 2019 14:18:06 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Have you verified there are *no other programs* in the entire greater
> ecosystem
> using that name?
I have not. But eg. FreeBSD and NetBSD don't support these names in
mailer.conf either:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/e
Have you verified there are *no other programs* in the entire greater ecosystem
using that name?
> On Tue, Mar 19 2019 07:26:41 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:33:07 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
> >
> > > ping - doesn't look removed yet :)
> >
> > Committed.
>
> thanks.
On Tue, Mar 19 2019 07:26:41 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:33:07 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
>
> > ping - doesn't look removed yet :)
>
> Committed.
thanks. that means no need for smtpctl and mailer.conf to check for it
any more.
diff --git a/etc/mailer.conf b/etc/mail
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:33:07 +0200, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
> ping - doesn't look removed yet :)
Committed.
- todd
On 18.03.2019 20:49, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Andre Stoebe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I, too, would like to have a way of signing the gzip archive in a
>> reproducible way, so here's a diff that uses -n, similar to gzip(1).
>
> Thanks. I think it's more consistent to store a zero time stamp. This diff is
> a
On Mon, Mar 04 2019 09:01:40 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 16:38:37 +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > I wish we had an historian who could enlighten us as to why both exist.
>
> That code actually predates sendmail and was in the original revision
> when delivermail was stil
13 matches
Mail list logo
