On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> The architecture already has big PIE. The issue is that clang doesn't
> support secure-plt for small pic. I haven't entirely figured out
> what's going on here and we probably need some further fixes to clang
> here. On the other hand I th
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:50:25PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
On 4 Feb 2019, at 22:00, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:07:22PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
Currently you can change a tun interface from being point to point to
being a broadcast interface. Why?
I'm using broadc
This is quite hilarious. The powerpc assembly code in LLVM's
libunwind can't be compiled by clang's integrated assembler. Now I do
agree that using ";" is a strange character to use to start comments
and I prefer writing %r3 instead of r3 myself as well. So this diff
converts the code. There ar
The architecture already has big PIE. The issue is that clang doesn't
support secure-plt for small pic. I haven't entirely figured out
what's going on here and we probably need some further fixes to clang
here. On the other hand I think it is probably time to recognize
there is more and more blo
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:00 PM Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> enh wrote:
> > it seems like OpenBSD did cherrypick this FreeBSD regex fix...
> >
> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/981dd2aa38f37e4d0dd86225c619e900fc03d82e#diff-d7c26714f9432399b202eefcedb97491
>
> That's an odd way to phrase apply
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 14:06:22 -0800, enh wrote:
> it seems like OpenBSD did cherrypick this FreeBSD regex fix...
>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/981dd2aa38f37e4d0dd86225c619e900fc0
> 3d82e#diff-d7c26714f9432399b202eefcedb97491
>
> ...but not this one, which also seems to apply to the
