Re: new USB audio class v2.0 driver

2019-01-01 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 11:02:39PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2018-12-31, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > > Our current USB sub-system has limitations that currently allow only > > the following combinations: > > - USB v2 devices on ehci(4) only > > - USB v1 devices on uhci(4), ohci(4

teach arm64 to print unconfigured simplebus devices

2019-01-01 Thread David Gwynne
This makes it more obvious what interesting things there are to hack on. Thoughts? ok? For example, from an od1000: dlg@o1000 fdt$ dmesg | grep 'not configured' "v2m" at ampintc0 not configured "clk100mhz_0" at simplebus0 not configured "clk375mhz" at simplebus0 not configured "clk333mhz" at sim

Re: new USB audio class v2.0 driver

2019-01-01 Thread Mike Monsivais
Thanks Alexandre! This is right off the top of my wish list. I tested with the following hardware: Sony UDA-1 (UACv2) Schiit Fulla (UACv1) Initial tests have audio playing great through both. > Then do your regular audio work, let me know how it works and > send me output of: > > dmesg >

Re: Another attempt to bypass ifqs on interfaces

2019-01-01 Thread David Gwynne
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 01:53:48PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 20/12/18(Thu) 11:35, David Gwynne wrote: > > My last attempt in "let etherip(4) output directly to the ip stack" > > didn't go so well. This one at least doesn't break bridge(4) on > > Ethernet. > > It breaks it on mpw(4). I ar

Re: new USB audio class v2.0 driver

2019-01-01 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2018-12-31, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > Our current USB sub-system has limitations that currently allow only > the following combinations: > - USB v2 devices on ehci(4) only > - USB v1 devices on uhci(4), ohci(4) or ehci(4) root hub only > > If you have an audio device that is class compliant

ospfd: send router lsa when removing an interface

2019-01-01 Thread Remi Locherer
Hi tech, when removing an interface from ospdf.conf and doing a reload other OSPF routers should get a router LSA update. Then they can remove the affected route. But currently this does not happen. The affected route might be used by other routers a long time after removing it from the config (un

pfctl: zap unused struct segment

2019-01-01 Thread Klemens Nanni
There since import and last used by ALTQ which henning removed in 2004. OK? Index: sbin/pfctl//pfctl.h === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.h,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -p -r1.57 pfctl.h --- sbin/pfctl//pfctl.h 6 Sep 2018

pfctl: bail out early on missing table command, zap wrapper

2019-01-01 Thread Klemens Nanni
Synopsis is `[-t table -T command [address ...]]', yet tables without commands are silently ignored: $ pfctl -t t pfctl: /dev/pf: Permission denied # pfctl -t t ; echo $? 0 Commands without tables are catched, but only after opening pf(4): $ pfctl -T show

Re: ripd: fib-priority

2019-01-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:06:53PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 01:33:39PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30 2018, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > Hi tech, > > > > > > after adding the config option "fib-priority" to ospfd/ospf6d I figured > > > out > >