On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:13:51PM +0100, def...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Could you be so kind to explain me why OpenBSD has no Dump core issue with
> Vim :
> https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/3619
>
> Many thanks
>
>
Hard question without delving deep and speding lots of time. But in
t
Hi,
Now that wscons is using sigio, adding support for FIOSETOWN/TIOCGPGRP
is trivial.
Also, visa@ pointed out that FIOSETOWN gets translated into TIOCSPGRP by
sys_ioctl(), handling of FIOSETOWN is therefore redundant.
Comments? OK?
Index: wskbd.c
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:45:55AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:40:40PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from the discussion I understand nobody rejects the functionality.
> >
> > To ease the review here again the diff (with incorporated feedback from
> > an
vlan(4) set's up the vlan tag with the right prio, so bpf shouldn't have
to do it and overwrite it.
ok?
Index: bpf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/bpf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.170
diff -u -p -r1.170 bpf.c
--- bpf.c 13 Jul 201
Hi, all
Could you be so kind to explain me why OpenBSD has no Dump core issue
with Vim :
https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/3619
Many thanks
Reyk Floeter(r...@openbsd.org) on 2018.11.19 13:12:46 +0100:
> Feedback? Tests? OKs?
test on my incarnation of kvm:
OpenBSD 6.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Mon Nov 19 18:32:29 CET 2018
ben...@test.openbsd.fluchtwagenfahrer.de:/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2097004544 (1999MB)
avai
So I hacked this together because I got annoyed by the fact that for
every pid I want to investigate I had to rerun fstat.
Diff below alleviates the searched pid from kvm_getfiles(3) to fstat(1).
I left atomicity (is there any in kvm_getfiles?) in place, by retrieving
everything in one go and fil
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > 1. How do we know if a device is non-removable, I don't think an MMC
> > device indicates this, maybe we have to determine this by the
> > controller?
>
> The hardware really doesn't know. It all depends how the controller
> is actually wired up. You have to rely on th
> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 13:10:19 +
> From: Ben Pye
>
> Hey all,
>
> In my quest for better OpenBSD support on my Chromebook 13 I have found
> that sdmmc(4)'s current strategy for suspend/resume only really works
> for removable storage. Upon a suspend it marks the device as dying, and
> upo
Hi,
the attached diff is another attempt at implementing a pvclock(4)
guest driver. This improves the clock on KVM and replaces the need
for using the VM-expensive acpihpet(4).
While pvclock(4) is available on KVM, Xen, Hyper-V (in a modified
form), it currently only attaches under KVM:
pvbus0
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:40:40PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from the discussion I understand nobody rejects the functionality.
>
> To ease the review here again the diff (with incorporated feedback from
> anton@ (redundant parens)).
>
> Any comments or OKs?
Not sure about this, sin
11 matches
Mail list logo