Hi Rivo,
vlan(4) can be configured to receive (and send) packets with 0 as the tag on
the wire, which this diff will break.
I'm pretty confident you can leave an IP configured on the physical network
interface, and create and configure a vlan interface on it without setting a
VLAN id. The unta
On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 09:02 -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 09:58 -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have an idea in mind tha
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 09:58 -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have an idea in mind that I'd like to share to ask you if you think
> > > it's worth givin
Hi!
In theory 802.1q header with vlan tag 0 can be used to just signal
priority. Now I'm seeing this in the wild. On a untagged port some
packets are coming with dotq header and some without. Currently we drop
all the packets with dotq header and vlan tag 0.
Following patch fixes this by recordin