Re: [PATCH] cu(1) man page: ~>, ~D and restricted mode

2018-08-03 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:49:04PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote: > Hey, > > The cu(1) tilde escapes ~C, ~R, ~X, ~$ and ~> are not allowed in > restricted mode; however, the man page states that ~D is not allowed > and omits the fact that ~> is not allowed. > > I have a patch below to correct this

Re: Show -o and -a in ssh-keygen(1) synopsis

2018-08-03 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:28:52PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote: > The ssh-keygen -o flag wasn't listed in the synopsis, and -a was only > listed with -T (where it specifies the number of primality tests), not > for specifying the number of KDF rounds of new-format private key files. > > I only teste

Show -o and -a in ssh-keygen(1) synopsis

2018-08-03 Thread Jeremy Evans
The ssh-keygen -o flag wasn't listed in the synopsis, and -a was only listed with -T (where it specifies the number of primality tests), not for specifying the number of KDF rounds of new-format private key files. I only tested creating a new private key and conversion of existing keys with -p. I

[PATCH] cu(1) man page: ~>, ~D and restricted mode

2018-08-03 Thread Kris Katterjohn
Hey, The cu(1) tilde escapes ~C, ~R, ~X, ~$ and ~> are not allowed in restricted mode; however, the man page states that ~D is not allowed and omits the fact that ~> is not allowed. I have a patch below to correct this. Cheers, Kris Katterjohn Index: cu.1 ===

Re: please test: unveil for ifconfig

2018-08-03 Thread Florian Obser
A bug in the unveil implementation has been found that prevents wifi firmware loading if this diff is applied. On August 2, 2018 7:04:31 PM GMT+02:00, Florian Obser wrote: >I have been told that this is going to fall into snaps soon. If you >are doing weird (or normal) things with ifconfig, pl

Re: [1/3] acme-client - correct error message in parse.y

2018-08-03 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Todd C. Miller(todd.mil...@sudo.ws) on 2018.08.03 11:06:58 -0600: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:20:47 +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote: > > > [Previously submitted large diff now being sent in three more-readily > > digestible pieces...] > > These all look fine to me, though I'm unusure how important th

Re: [1/3] acme-client - correct error message in parse.y

2018-08-03 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:20:47 +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote: > [Previously submitted large diff now being sent in three more-readily > digestible pieces...] These all look fine to me, though I'm unusure how important the style fixes are. It may make merging changes from upstream more difficult b

bgpd: reload RIBs in background

2018-08-03 Thread Claudio Jeker
So the reshuffling made it possible to simply run the reconfigure of the RIBs in the background and no longer lock up the RDE for extended times. In short this means that during 'bgpctl reload' other bgpctl calls no longer block and that also UPDATE from neighbors are fully processed. This does no

Re: rad(8): move dns settings to global options

2018-08-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/08/03 14:58, Florian Obser wrote: > sthen pointed out that it's better to overwrite dns options, not to merge That works exactly how I'd expect - OK. > diff --git engine.c engine.c > index db31fb2a15b..93010cace51 100644 > --- engine.c > +++ engine.c > @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ engine_dispatch_

Re: rad(8): move dns settings to global options

2018-08-03 Thread Florian Obser
sthen pointed out that it's better to overwrite dns options, not to merge diff --git engine.c engine.c index db31fb2a15b..93010cace51 100644 --- engine.c +++ engine.c @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ engine_dispatch_main(int fd, short event, void *bula) { static struct rad_conf *nconf;

[3/3] acme-client - style(9) cleanup in parse.y

2018-08-03 Thread Ross L Richardson
This diff contains only style(9) cleanup: - mainly "return (x);" => "return x;" - a few "if (x)" ==> "if (x != something)" No change to parse.o Ross Index: parse.y === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/pars

[2/3] acme-client - correct "sign with" error messages in parse.y

2018-08-03 Thread Ross L Richardson
It appears that, sometime in the early development of the config file stuff, there was a different syntax for what is now "sign with". A couple of error messages refer to "use" [but should not]. Ross Index: parse.y === RCS file:

[1/3] acme-client - correct error message in parse.y

2018-08-03 Thread Ross L Richardson
[Previously submitted large diff now being sent in three more-readily digestible pieces...] The error message looks to have been copied/pasted from the earlier DOMAIN CHAIN CERT STRING case, but not edited. Ross Index: parse.y ==

acme-client.conf.5 - "sign with" setting is (also) optional

2018-08-03 Thread Ross L Richardson
sign with is the final optional setting not yet documented If absent, defaults to the first authority in the config. Ross Index: acme-client.conf.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.conf.5,v retriev

acme-client.conf.5 - domain chain certificate is (also) optional

2018-08-03 Thread Ross L Richardson
domain chain certificate is one of the two remaining optional settings not yet documented Ross Index: acme-client.conf.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/acme-client.conf.5,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p

rad(8): move dns settings to global options

2018-08-03 Thread Florian Obser
Move dns settings to global options so that they don't need to be repeated in every interface block. OK? diff --git engine.c engine.c index db31fb2a15b..93010cace51 100644 --- engine.c +++ engine.c @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ engine_dispatch_main(int fd, short event, void *bula) { static struct

Re: bgpd: sofreconfig in reshuffle

2018-08-03 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:56:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:39:31PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > Instead of walking the Adj-RIB-In per RIB walk it once and check per > > > prefix if the RIB needs

Re: bgpd: sofreconfig in reshuffle

2018-08-03 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:56:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:39:31PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > Instead of walking the Adj-RIB-In per RIB walk it once and check per > > prefix if the RIB needs an update or not. This will make it easier to make > > this run withou

Re: correct nd6_timer_next accounting

2018-08-03 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:11:46AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote: > Anyone brave enough to OK this? I haven't heard from anyone that it > breaks their internet... No regressions so far on both my daily machine and gateway at home. OK kn