Hello,
I work on PostgreSQL. I don't use OpenBSD, but recently I've been
investigating how fsync() reports write-back errors on all operating
systems that people like to run PostgreSQL on:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Fsync_Errors
It seems to me that on OpenBSD, asynchronous write-back erro
The diff below moves armv7 to the so-called softfp float ABI. This is
the same ABI as we have now, except that it allows the compiler to
generate hardware floating-point instructions. Floating-point
function arguments and return values are still passed in the integer
registers though.
This is un
> what we need is an eventually consistent 16 bit number microservice message
> bus that all ping processes can subscribe to.
And it should be available as early as possible during boot, so I think
its place is in init(8).
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:34:03PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> @@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ nfs_lookup(void *v)
> flags = cnp->cn_flags;
>
> *vpp = NULLVP;
> + newvp = NULLVP;
> if ((flags & ISLASTCN) && (dvp->v_mount->mnt_flag & MNT_RDONLY) &&
> (cnp->cn_nameiop == DEL
Yes this also works for me.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> > I got a problem report from Mark Willson:
> >
> > "I recently installed mg (via the Debian package) under WSL on
> Windows
> > 10.
> > I fo
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:56:28PM +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> As tb@ pointed out, u64ton can overflow on ULONG_MAX. It could also
> happen on systems with 64 bit int and INT_MIN, although we don't have
> such a system supported by our code base.
>
> You can reach the u64ton function by prin
Job Snijders wrote:
> I’m not great at math, with a 16 bit random value, wouldn’t we start
> running into ID collisions around 256 concurrent ping processes? Perhaps
> that already is the case today and this patch does nothing to improve that,
> but also doesn’t make it worse.
what we need is an e
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> I got a problem report from Mark Willson:
>
> "I recently installed mg (via the Debian package) under WSL on Windows
> 10.
> I found that the 'backup-to-home-directory' option didn't work.
>
> The cause of this appears to b
Hi all,
The main page[0] reads:
[...], released Apr 2, 2018.
while the 6.3 release page, which the above links to[1] says:
Released Apr 15, 2018
[0] https://www.openbsd.org/
[1] https://www.openbsd.org/63.html
Regards,
Raf
Index: 63.html
=
On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:37:28 +0900 (JST)
Naoki Fukaumi wrote:
> sending IPMI command can fail for some reason (e.g. during BMC reset,
> and possibly BMC is just busy?), then it should be better to return
> error than panic().
Verified.
# ipmitool mc reset warm
# ipmitool fru
caused the pani
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :Or is there any real difference between `tableid' and `rtable' I'm not
> :aware of?
> :
>
> rtables are layer 3.
>
> rdomains are layer 2 (aka, arp and ndp lookups).
The question was not about rtables vs rdomains.
It is about tab
On 2018 Apr 11 (Wed) at 23:01:45 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
:On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
:> No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
:`tableid' surely isn't wrong, but using the argument name across manuals
:seems nicer to me.
:
No, they are different th
12 matches
Mail list logo
