On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:50:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:52:49PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:58:47AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:52:20AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Date: Mon
The routine skip_empty_lines_and_read_char() is an optimization to skip over
blocks of comment lines. When it reads an unescaped '#' it uses the helper
routine skip_to_end_of_line(). But skip_to_end_of_line() doesn't fold lines
as it should and like its parent caller does. (See patch at end of mess
Apparently, the control bit only controls whether the cpu will automatically do
fixups for word or smaller single load/store. Targeting an unaligned address
with a *multiple* load/store instruction will still fault. Over in Linux land,
there's this giant grody handler that has emulation for the
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:11:23 +0100
> From: "Boudewijn Dijkstra"
>
> Op Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:51:12 +0100 schreef Mark Kettenis
> :
> > I hate to loose yet another strict-alignment canary, but the reality
> > is that the rest of the world assumes that armv7 supports unaligned
> > access which
Op Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:51:12 +0100 schreef Mark Kettenis
:
I hate to loose yet another strict-alignment canary, but the reality
is that the rest of the world assumes that armv7 supports unaligned
access which means that compilers generate code that assumes this
works when compiling code for armv
On 23/02/18(Fri) 04:08, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Martin Pieuchot [2018-02-21 09:37]:
> > On 21/02/18(Wed) 02:37, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > I'd suggest moving the pool allocation and the function in net/pf*.c
> > and only have a function call under #if NPF > 0.
>
> worth discussing, but imo that
