The diff below adds proctreelk, an rwlock protecting the links of the
process tree and related bits, as well as uidinfolk, an rwlock protecting
the uidinfo hash table.
Parts of this are based on FreeBSD's proctree_lock, particularly the
reorganization of enterpgrp() into enternewpgrp() and ent
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Krzysztof Strzeszewski
wrote:
> This is very interested "the kernel did non panic".
panic() is an explicit call in the kernel, made when some sanity or
consistency check fails. Dereferencing a bogus pointer results in a failed
page fault trap and goes to ddb di
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 04:46:21PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Currently `machine video 7' will always list all available modes just
> like `machine video' before setting mode 7. Since the screen is
> reset/cleared when setting the mode, listing them beforehand is
> hardly ever useful and rather
mikeb has suggested some things that I'm trying.
for the record: I didn't include a stack trace here because it only has
the break-into-ddb path (intr_handler/comitr/db_enter) on the active cpu,
and ipis on the others, so not really any use.
On 2017/10/14 09:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I recen
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 13:17:33 +1100
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> >From linux 4.4.y/v4.4.92
Sure.
>
> commit 33d1fa43aad4ca11f5d01ede363c1dbdd2010540
> Author: Jani Nikula
> AuthorDate: Thu Sep 21 17:19:20 2017 +0300
> Commit: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> CommitDate: Thu Oct 12 11:27:35 2017
This is very interested "the kernel did non panic". Where is memcmp in
sys? When I run bsd.rd end mount filesystem I can't find memcmp.
http://wklej.org/hash/e5591ccc88f/
.
.
.
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 8 va
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi
>
> So, some background... I raised my concerns to phessler@ about the low
> default configuration values. This was about a year ago when I noticed
> how quick I could fill all states and stop the machine from accepting
> new con
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Krzysztof Strzeszewski
wrote:
> When I upgrade 6.1 to 6.2 in my futro s400 i have kernel panic.
>
It's unfortunate that no one has submitted to dm...@openbsd.org the dmesg
from that hardware since February 2016. Please consider doing so every
time you upgrade y
I changed only name kernel :)
W dniu 14.10.2017 o 01:13, Mike Larkin pisze:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Strzeszewski wrote:
Hi,
When I upgrade 6.1 to 6.2 in my futro s400 i have kernel panic.
Try 6.1 stock kernel and see if that works. Then at least we know if we
intr
Hi
So, some background... I raised my concerns to phessler@ about the low
default configuration values. This was about a year ago when I noticed
how quick I could fill all states and stop the machine from accepting
new connections.
He kindly explained that the defaults are set low to accommodate
I recently updated my home router from a kernel from the start of September
(unfortunately I don't have the exact date, /var/log/messages has rotated
past it now) which has been stable, to a snap from yesterday (Oct 13
00:44:27 MDT). No config changes between the two. It hanged overnight,
but no pr
11 matches
Mail list logo