Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:44:37AM +, Miod Vallat wrote: > >> > Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11 > >> > a 0: > >> > 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11 > >> > 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11 > >> > Your choice: > >> > >> Time to choose another package? > > > > I think in this cas

Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Miod Vallat
>> > Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11 >> > a 0: >> > 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11 >> > 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11 >> > Your choice: >> >> Time to choose another package? > > I think in this case choice is good. Indeed, but why aren't vim-no_x11 packages listed as possible

Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Antoine Jacoutot: > > > > > Why not just: > > > > > > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11 > > > > > > So we don't have to change it each release? >

Re: ure(4) fix

2017-03-29 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:47:35AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Looking at the code, it is possible for the device to return a packet > that is larger than what fits into a standard 2k mbuf cluster. So > let's replace the handrolled mbuf allocation./copy code with an > invocation of m_devget(9),

faq6.html patch

2017-03-29 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
I noticed this a few months ago, but forgot to send it. Index: faq6.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq6.html,v retrieving revision 1.435 diff -u -p -u -r1.435 faq6.html --- faq6.html 25 Mar 2017 19:07:05 - 1.435 +++ faq6

Re: [PATCH] openbgpd: Add support for BGP Validation State Communities (RFC 8097)

2017-03-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:12:42PM -0500, Job Snijders wrote: > Dear all, > > BGP Origin Validation State communities are non-transitive opaque > extended communities to carry the origination Autonomous System > validation state inside an autonomous system. IBGP speakers that > receive this valida

ure(4) fix

2017-03-29 Thread Mark Kettenis
Looking at the code, it is possible for the device to return a packet that is larger than what fits into a standard 2k mbuf cluster. So let's replace the handrolled mbuf allocation./copy code with an invocation of m_devget(9), which will make sure a chain is allocated for large packets. Lightly t

Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Antoine Jacoutot: > > > Why not just: > > > > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11 > > > > So we don't have to change it each release? > > Because people won't let Emacs 21 die. Ah but, you just killed me :-) > Ambig

Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Antoine Jacoutot: > Why not just: > > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11 > > So we don't have to change it each release? Because people won't let Emacs 21 die. Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11 a 0: 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11 Your cho

Re: sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:10:49PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Sync the version of the example package. ok? Why not just: # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11 So we don't have to change it each release? > Index: root.mail > ===

sync root.mail

2017-03-29 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Sync the version of the example package. ok? Index: root.mail === RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/root/root.mail,v retrieving revision 1.121 diff -u -p -r1.121 root.mail --- root.mail 5 Mar 2017 15:08:03 - 1.121 +++ root.mail 29

Re: pf: time since uptime instead of wall clock?

2017-03-29 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:17:16AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > currently the pf status struct contains the time since pf was enabled as > seen on the wall clock. This means when time drifts, or is set to some > earlier value, the time will be off. If we use time since uptime it > always increme