On February 17, 2017 11:53:44 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Grillet
wrote:
>How do I actually use rmt?
>
>I want to backup a guest domain on a T2000 using a tape drive on the
>primary domain.
>Both domains run OpenBSD 6.0.
>
>The way I read the mt manual page, I should be able to do (from the
>guest,
>a
How do I actually use rmt?
I want to backup a guest domain on a T2000 using a tape drive on the
primary domain.
Both domains run OpenBSD 6.0.
The way I read the mt manual page, I should be able to do (from the guest,
as root)
> mt primary:/dev/rst0 status
and this should deliver the command to rm
Florian Obser(flor...@openbsd.org) on 2017.02.17 19:20:41 +:
> ... and in case you want to see what's actually going on,
> this is without the _t conversion churn:
thanks, and ok (for the one with the type stuff)
> commit 4cfab5a8d90abb380ae6a64da825883a2f360dc1
> Author: Florian Obser
> D
On 2017/02/17 16:04, Florian Obser wrote:
> tests, OKs?
More _t to _type (I zoned out a bit reading that diff) :-)
I didn't spot anything concerning, there's only a small real change, and it's
working for me. OK.
... and in case you want to see what's actually going on,
this is without the _t conversion churn:
commit 4cfab5a8d90abb380ae6a64da825883a2f360dc1
Author: Florian Obser
Date: Fri Feb 17 15:04:08 2017 +0100
log at verbosity 3.
diff --git nsec3.c nsec3.c
index f24377d4259..960e7216dad 10064
ping?
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 07:58:27PM +0200, Ossi Herrala wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 01:34:14AM +0200, Ossi Herrala wrote:
>
> > After couple of private mails with guenther@ we came up with the
> > following patch.
> >
> > Introduce new flag FORK_PID1 for fork1(9).
> >
> > This flag is
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 08:18:36PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:11:55AM -0500, Dale Rahn wrote:
> > The logic to handle PMAP_CANFAIL, the logic was inverted originally.
> >
> > Code has been simplified so that it is test for if !CANFAIL then panic
>
> Looks good, but h
OK.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:09:25PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using ipcomp(4) with IPv6 transport mode I get this error:
>
> ping6: sendmsg: Protocol family not supported
>
> The break in the switch statement is missing since rev 1.1 from 2001.
> So I am the first one test
Hi,
When using ipcomp(4) with IPv6 transport mode I get this error:
ping6: sendmsg: Protocol family not supported
The break in the switch statement is missing since rev 1.1 from 2001.
So I am the first one testing this.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/ip_ipcomp.c
On 2017/02/17 08:43, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:45:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/02/09 15:59, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Here's an update to the release candidate for 1.6.1. Tests/feedback
> > > welcome.
> > > Diff is 600K so it's at https://junkpile.org
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:14:29AM -0500, Dale Rahn wrote:
> Fix pieces of aarch64 ddb support:
> kernel vs user mode detection
> implement (optimize) 8 byte reads
> cast address pointers to vaddr_t, not uint32_t (do not truncate)
> remove db_fetch_reg(), not used by OpenBSD
> implement ddb backtra
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:11:55AM -0500, Dale Rahn wrote:
> The logic to handle PMAP_CANFAIL, the logic was inverted originally.
>
> Code has been simplified so that it is test for if !CANFAIL then panic
Looks good, but how about using __func__? Avoids going > 80 in one case.
Index: pmap.c
===
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:45:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/02/09 15:59, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Here's an update to the release candidate for 1.6.1. Tests/feedback welcome.
> > Diff is 600K so it's at https://junkpile.org/unbound-1.6.1rc1.diff rather
> > than inline.
>
> Updat
13 matches
Mail list logo
