this diff lets the pool gc reclaim idle memory held by cpu caches.
it does this by recording when the global depot of items was first
added to. the gc checks that timestamp and if the depot hasnt been
emptied again in the last 4 seconds, it moves a list of items from
the depot back to the pools fr
Emulation had multiple sets of hooks; here's the diff to kill the hooks
used at exec, fork, and exit time, as they are always NULL.
ok?
Philip
Index: sys/proc.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/proc.h,v
retrieving revision 1.232
d
Hi,
The bug reported by Ryan, pulse.purge at gmail.com demonstraits the
memory map should be determined after calling efi_cleanup().
amd64 UEFI machine fails to load kernel; displays "ExitBootServices"
and reboots
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=148253785924157&w=2
I tested it on a BIOS
Hi,
Remove the ipsec protocol callbacks which all do the same. Implement
it in ipsec_common_input_cb() instead. The code that was copied
to ah6_input_cb() is now in ip6_ours() so we can call it directly.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/ipsec_input.c
==
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 07/02/17(Tue) 10:29, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> > > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any
> > > explanation why it is different than the idio
Hi,
Error propagation does neither make sense for ip input path nor for
asynchronous callbacks. Make the IPsec functions void, there is
already a counter in the error path.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/ip_ipsp.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:44:23PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Revised after the change in the counters api. Passed make release on
> amd64, runtime tested on GENERIC armv7 and GENERIC.MP amd64.
OK bluhm@
>
>
> Index: net/pf.c
>
OK once the XXX from ip_esp.c is removed too.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:15:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned before, IPsec packets could be dropped unaccounted if
> output after crypto failed. Add a counter for that case.
>
> ok?
>
> bluhm
>
> Index: sys/netinet/ip_
Hi,
As mentioned before, IPsec packets could be dropped unaccounted if
output after crypto failed. Add a counter for that case.
ok?
bluhm
Index: sys/netinet/ip_ah.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_ah.c,v
Could someone who uses divert socket confirm that this diff works fine?
ok?
Index: netinet/ip_divert.c
===
RCS file: /d/cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_divert.c,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -p -r1.43 ip_divert.c
--- netinet/ip_divert.
libressl-2.5.1-medusade.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 07/02/17(Tue) 10:29, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any
> > explanation why it is different than the idiom we use in other places.
>
> oh
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any
> explanation why it is different than the idiom we use in other places.
oh, just because i didn't bother making them all the same
On 07/02/17(Tue) 13:54, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Now that we found and fixed multiple deadlocks involving the NET_LOCK()
> and unix domain sockets, let's do as if it wasn't strictly necessary.
>
> The NET_LOCK() has been introduced to prevent the softnet thread to run
> while a userland process is
On 02/07/17 12:32, Joel Sing wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2017 20:18:48 Andreas Bartelt wrote:
Yes, right - thanks. I wasn't aware that this is actually a MUST
requirement from RFC 4492. I'm quite surprised that the "Supported
Elliptic Curves Extension" is also used in order to specify any allow
Now that we found and fixed multiple deadlocks involving the NET_LOCK()
and unix domain sockets, let's do as if it wasn't strictly necessary.
The NET_LOCK() has been introduced to prevent the softnet thread to run
while a userland process is pushing packets down into the Network Stack.
This do not
This diff enables short slot time, accidentally left disabled in 11n mode.
Short vs. long slot time controls the (very small) amount of time devices
spend waiting between frame transmissions.
The only wifi devices which do not support short slot time are 11b ones.
Index: ieee80211_proto.c
===
On Monday 06 February 2017 20:18:48 Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> Yes, right - thanks. I wasn't aware that this is actually a MUST
> requirement from RFC 4492. I'm quite surprised that the "Supported
> Elliptic Curves Extension" is also used in order to specify any allowed
> curves for use in the contex
On 03/02/17(Fri) 12:06, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > @@ -444,6 +447,11 @@ uaudio_match(struct device *parent, void
> > > > > if (uaa->iface == NULL || uaa->device == NULL)
> > > > > return (UMATCH_NONE);
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (uaa->vendor == USB_VENDO
On 07/02/17(Tue) 11:15, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 10:12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:18, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> >> > has be
On 7 February 2017 at 11:14, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 07/02/17(Tue) 11:03, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 7 February 2017 at 10:13, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> > On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> >> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> >> > PF has its own home-brew
On 07/02/17(Tue) 11:03, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 10:13, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> >> > has be
On 7 February 2017 at 10:12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:18, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
>> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't
On 7 February 2017 at 10:13, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
>> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 06/02/17(Mon) 12:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Paul and Antoine reported that, since the NET_LOCK() went in, doing a
> > channel scan with iwm(4) and iwn(4) freezes X.
> >
> > This is a deadlock due to the fact that wireless dr
On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any
> > explanation why it is different than the idio
On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:18, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It
> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any
> > explanation why it is different than the idio
27 matches
Mail list logo
