On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 07:30:17AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:45:36PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > Sync some xlockmore files with the 5.50 release to fix build errors
> > > with clang of the form:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 07:30:17AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:45:36PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Sync some xlockmore files with the 5.50 release to fix build errors
> > with clang of the form:
>
> Sure, ok.
>
> I remember I had more changes to make when trying
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:48:10PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Only compile tested.
Looks sane to me. I don't have any hardware to test it on right now
though.
ok.
>
> Index: configure
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/xserver/conf
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:45:36PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Sync some xlockmore files with the 5.50 release to fix build errors
> with clang of the form:
Sure, ok.
I remember I had more changes to make when trying clang from ports on
xenocara during g2k16, but it may be that clang got more g
Only compile tested.
Index: configure
===
RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/xserver/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 configure
--- configure 11 Oct 2016 22:15:52 - 1.63
+++ configure 2 Feb 2017 06:52:46 -
It looks like I'm about ready to import perl 5.24.1 into base with
updated local patches.
The infrastructure to do that is still here on github:
https://github.com/afresh1/OpenBSD-perl/
You can download a pre-patched perl from here and use it to replace
src/gnu/usr.bin/perl and update your syste
I noticed that an 11a/b ath(4) card, which does not support 11g,
includes 11g rates ("xrates") in association requests it sends on 2GHz:
20:55:03.490128 802.11 flags=0<>: association request, \
caps=2041, ssid (stsp.name), \
rates 1M* 2M* 5M 6M 9M 11M 12M 18M, xrates 24M 36M 48M 54M, \
rsn 0x01000
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:30:15PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> The TOK_NEXT_SERVER case in parse_statement() calls
> parse_ip_addr_or_hostname(),
> so I think the next-server option wants a host name, not a domain name:
Any takers? I previously suggested 'host name', but the rest of the page
wri
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 01/02/17(Wed) 19:27, David Hill wrote:
> > Hello -
> >
> > This diff makes sosetopt responsible for m_free which is much simpler.
> > Requested by bluhm@
>
> I'd suggest to move the m_free(9) calls to sys_setsockopt(). This
>
On 31/01/17(Tue) 14:05, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 2017-01-29 Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 29/01/17(Sun) 19:33, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > @@ -444,6 +447,11 @@ uaudio_match(struct device *parent, void
> > > if (uaa->iface == NULL || uaa->device == NULL)
> > >
On 01/02/17(Wed) 19:27, David Hill wrote:
> Hello -
>
> This diff makes sosetopt responsible for m_free which is much simpler.
> Requested by bluhm@
I'd suggest to move the m_free(9) calls to sys_setsockopt(). This
simplifies the existing code even more and will make it easier to use
the stack
On 01/02/17(Wed) 20:48, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make ip6_input() more like ipv4_input() and introduce
> ip6_ours().
>
> ok?
This will help making v6 forwarding path un-KERNEL_LOCK()'d, ok mpi@
> Index: netinet6/ip6_input.c
> =
12 matches
Mail list logo