On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:29:21PM +0330, temp+...@frad.ir wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> I recently checked the slowcgi(8) and found that it might have an issue
> when buf_pos is at the end of buffer and buf_len is zero.
>
> Am I right?
we can simplify this even more. There is no need to remember the
b
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:07:31 +, Florian Obser wrote:
> traceroute(8) never sees a timeout when poll(2) returns when it receives
> a packet not intended for us. E.g. a ping(8) is running in parallel.
> In this case we need to account for the time we already waited.
Looks good but please make w
One change with this diff is that the approval script will run as
the invoking user, not the target user. I'm not sure that really
makes a difference though.
- todd
traceroute(8) never sees a timeout when poll(2) returns when it receives
a packet not intended for us. E.g. a ping(8) is running in parallel.
In this case we need to account for the time we already waited.
Pointed out by Gabriel Nieto on bugs@, thanks!
OK?
diff --git traceroute.c traceroute.
On 07 Jan 2017 21:14:17 -0700, "Andy Bradford" wrote:
> As it turns out, it is because I have an approve entry in
> /etc/login.conf and this requires the ability to fork the approval
> program. When su tries to run approve it fails and I find the following
> in dmesg:
>
> su
Matthieu Herrb:
> In my analysis of the changed symbols, only a minor bump was required,
> but now that people have started installing libfreetype.so.28.0,
> commit it like that.
FWIW, I run such testing bulk builds without plist registration,
don't upload the resulting packages, and wipe the aff
"Ted Unangst" wrote:
> This option is not posix (not like that's stopped find accumulating a
> dozen extensions), but it is in gnu and freebsd (for 20 years). it's
> also somewhat popular among sysadmins and blogs, etc. and perhaps most
> importantly, it nicely solves one of the more troublesome
On 12.1.2017. 18:27, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 12.1.2017. 16:20, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
>>> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>>>
>>> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:17:02PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote:
> >> Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment.
> >
> >> As usual, please test it.
> >>
> >> And, if you c
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:51:51AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> >
> > > Consider the following script which calculates the sum of the first N
> > > integers re
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:51:51AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>
> > Consider the following script which calculates the sum of the first N
> > integers recursively:
> >
> > $ cat >sum.sh < > sum() {
> > [ $1 -eq 0 ] && echo $2
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> Consider the following script which calculates the sum of the first N
> integers recursively:
>
> $ cat >sum.sh < sum() {
> [ $1 -eq 0 ] && echo $2 || sum $(($1 - 1)) $(($2 + $1))
> }
>
> sum 5
> !
>
> Executing the script wit
Consider the following script which calculates the sum of the first N
integers recursively:
$ cat >sum.sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
