On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff implements some improvements to realloc and some cleanup of
> the MALLOC_MOVE code.
>
> 1. When shrinking a chunk allocation, compare the size of the current
> allocation to the size of the new allocation (instead
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>
> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
> the NET_LOCK() held.
>
> Finally replace a comment
On 12.1.2017. 16:20, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
>> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>>
>> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
>> the NET_LOCK() held
Hi,
When traversing the mount list, the current mount point is locked
with vfs_busy(). When a FOREACH_SAFE macro is used, the next pointer
is not locked and could be freed by another process.
I remember that someone showed me a panic that ended in one of these
functions, but I have lost the bug
Stuart Henderson:
> > And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build.
>
> i386 bulk was clean.
amd64 also looks fine.
(iridium and chromium are still building on their n-th try...)
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:27:47AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:54:55PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This diff adds 11n support to the athn(4) driver.
> > Requires -current net80211 code from today.
>
> A better diff which fixes several bugs.
jmc@ found out I di
On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>
> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
> the NET_LOCK() held.
>
> Finally replace a comment above pfkeyv2_ipo
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote:
>> Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment.
>
>> As usual, please test it.
>>
>> And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build.
>
> i386 bulk was clean.
Thank you, Stuar
On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote:
> Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment.
> As usual, please test it.
>
> And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build.
i386 bulk was clean.
Hi tech@,
Most fonts in wsfont are not compiled in by default, and while some are
worth keeping and using, I would like to propose deleting some of them
in order to make space for larger sized fonts.
The Sony fonts are Serif, which doesn't work very well for monospaced
bitmap fonts intended for c
Hi tech@,
Here is a diff to ansify cpu_sysctl() where not previously done.
Comments? OK?
Index: sys/arch/alpha/alpha/machdep.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/alpha/alpha/machdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.176
diff -u -p -r1.176 mach
On 23.12.2016. 16:57, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 21.12.2016. 23:15, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it seems that bfd is working with Force10 S4810 and Extreme Networks
>>> x460 switches. I can test it with cisco c6k5 if you want?
>>
>> Hei,
>>
>> i'm sure phessler (who might not read this
12 matches
Mail list logo