On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 09:30:15PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I find it confusing to read a man page that constantly tells me that this
> option is like some other option. I have to go read the other option, then
> return here and reparse what's different. In my unimpeachable opinion, the
> text f
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > In the following code, namei() call is done in doutimensat(), and
> > nd.ni_vp is passed to dovutimens() as vp.
> >
> > In the same way, in dofutimens() the vp (from getvn
I find it confusing to read a man page that constantly tells me that this
option is like some other option. I have to go read the other option, then
return here and reparse what's different. In my unimpeachable opinion, the
text for each option should be self contained, with references to other
opt
Hello,
The attached patch amends bin/cat/cat.c so the output is the same aside
from blank lines being numbered or unnumbered, depending on whether cat
was invoked with -ne or -be.
At present, when cat is invoked with -be, there is an aditional
difference that the '$' on blank lines is placed on th
Hi,
The variable swapping between inp, newinp and oldinpcb in syn_cache_get()
is overly complicated. Simplify the code without functional change.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/tcp_input.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/
Pretty sure section 7 should now refer directly to bulk(8)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:52:06PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 23/06/16 18:14, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> > It adds two switches:
> > -c client_cert_file
> > -k client_key_file
That's fine.
> > Minor modification in CAfile setup as well to match the netcat code.
Please do not chan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> When calling revoke(2) on a no-tty device, we return ENOTTY without
> relaxing the vnode obtained with namei().
>
> Use the error code path instead to call vrele(vp) before returning
> ENOTTY.
>
> OK ?
ok guenther@
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> In the following code, namei() call is done in doutimensat(), and
> nd.ni_vp is passed to dovutimens() as vp.
>
> In the same way, in dofutimens() the vp (from getvnode) is vref() before
> calling dovutimens().
>
> So I think we should call
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 06:26:36AM +, César Pereida wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016, 8:19 AM Brent Cook wrote:
>
> > Hmm, on second review, something seems odd.
> >
> > César, why does this patch also replace all of the stack-allocated
> > BIGNUM's with heap ones? Why add a new set of failur
Well, it introduces a different failure mode - Not necessarily a bad
thing although this will behave differently.
On OpenBSD, malloc() is pretty random as is stack addresses, so while
the predictability of the location of BN object
will still be otherwise unpredictable.. On operatiing systems with
Hi,
When calling revoke(2) on a no-tty device, we return ENOTTY without
relaxing the vnode obtained with namei().
Use the error code path instead to call vrele(vp) before returning
ENOTTY.
OK ?
--
Sebastien Marie
Index: kern/vfs_syscalls.c
=
Hi,
In the following code, namei() call is done in doutimensat(), and
nd.ni_vp is passed to dovutimens() as vp.
In the same way, in dofutimens() the vp (from getvnode) is vref() before
calling dovutimens().
So I think we should call vput() before returning any error.
--
Sebastien Marie
Index:
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:46:26 +1000
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> With cpsw being a switch getting the port config isn't as
> straightforward as fec.
Not terribly fond of the !strcmp() idiom, but otherwise this looks ok
to me.
> We only handle the first port at the moment, though the following
On 06/26/16 09:28, Theo Buehler wrote:
There is a stray '. fs' here:
+The following steps will create the boot and installation images
+. fs
With that removed, this is ok tb@
Thanks Theo.
Please see attached updated diff. Any other feedback?
Index: man8/release.8
==
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 09:18:59AM -0400, Bryan Everly wrote:
> I have attached an updated man page for release.8 with feedback from jmc at
> Theo's request. He preferred that we split the diff with the new content
> from the diff changing from second person to third person and submit them
> separ
I have attached an updated man page for release.8 with feedback from jmc
at Theo's request. He preferred that we split the diff with the new
content from the diff changing from second person to third person and
submit them separately.
This diff is just the new content. Any more feedback or c
With cpsw being a switch getting the port config isn't as
straightforward as fec.
We only handle the first port at the moment, though the following diff
fetches settings that might be helpful were we to support a second.
To give an idea of what the fdt looks like here are the cpsw nodes
extracted
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:09:05PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> I recently picked up a cheap Cherry View based mini-pc and found its onboard
> RTL8152 (usb) ethernet wasn't supported, so I ported ure(4) from freebsd.
>
> I'm fairly sure there are some endianness issues, but I can't test on a
>
I recently picked up a cheap Cherry View based mini-pc and found its onboard
RTL8152 (usb) ethernet wasn't supported, so I ported ure(4) from freebsd.
I'm fairly sure there are some endianness issues, but I can't test on a
big endian platform as this is the only hardware I have. It also leaves th
20 matches
Mail list logo
