Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: YASUOKA Masahiko [mailto:yasu...@openbsd.org]
> Sent: onsdag 13. april 2016 14.36
> To: ve...@vegarlh.com
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: EFIboot and HP Stream 13
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:27:51 +0200
> "Vegar Linge Haaland" wrote:
> >>
On 13 April 2016 at 15:26, Mike Larkin wrote:
> The Intel SDM is a little unclear as to precisely how to check for the
> presence
> of the general purpose architectural performance monitoring counters (via the
> 'rdpmc' instruction). In one place in the manual, it describes capabilities
> based o
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 06:26:05AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> The Intel SDM is a little unclear as to precisely how to check for the
> presence
> of the general purpose architectural performance monitoring counters (via the
> 'rdpmc' instruction). In one place in the manual, it describes capabil
Hi tech@
Based on the thread [http://marc.info/?t=14601536351] now following
up with a much improved diff by valuable patient guidance and very fine
feedback from ratchov@ tj@ tb@ that got accepted in as FAQ section 13.5
Learned a lot from the iterative process, thank you all & best regards,
On 2016-04-07, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Let's illustrate the issue:
>
> $ sh -c 'echo "`echo \"hi\"`"'
> hi
> $ sh -o posix -c 'echo "`echo \"hi\"`"'
> "hi"
>
> I'll just quote ksh.1:
>
> o Occurrences of \" inside double quoted `..` command substitutions.
> In POSIX mode, t
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 04:25:01PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> Hoist sysct and kvm calls, and pledge stdio, rpath, vminfo.
>
> Rob
Update diff based on comments from tb@:
Changes include the following:
- kd is a pointer, so compare with NULL (not 0).
- simply nlistf/memf condition statment in
>> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:10:23 +0200
>> From: Michal Mazurek
>>
>> Depending on the NOLOCK flag, the KERNEL_LOCK will, or will not be acquired
>> before calling pledge_syscall(). I therefore conclude that KERNEL_LOCK
>> is not needed to call pledge_syscall().
>
>It really depends on what the b
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 06:15:46AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > It should be latched, at least on modern 16550-like UARTs. From
> > a PC16550D datasheet:
>
> Keep in mind that com(4) is intended to support 16450 chips, which have
> no FIFO. I believe that the current ordering of the operations is
The Intel SDM is a little unclear as to precisely how to check for the presence
of the general purpose architectural performance monitoring counters (via the
'rdpmc' instruction). In one place in the manual, it describes capabilities
based on cpu family (using family names like "Intel Core Duo, In
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:27:51 +0200
"Vegar Linge Haaland" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-t...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-t...@openbsd.org] On
>> Behalf Of YASUOKA Masahiko
>> Sent: onsdag 13. april 2016 09.58
>> To: ve...@vegarlh.com
>> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
>> Subject: R
From: "Mike Belopuhov"
To: "Rob Pierce"
Cc: "tech"
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 6:05:19 PM
Subject: Re: pledge pstat
BQ_BEGIN
On 12 April 2016 at 22:25, Rob Pierce wrote:
> Hoist sysct and kvm calls, and pledge stdio, rpath, vminfo.
>
> Rob
>
Please make sure that "pstat -d" s
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-t...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-t...@openbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of YASUOKA Masahiko
> Sent: onsdag 13. april 2016 09.58
> To: ve...@vegarlh.com
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: EFIboot and HP Stream 13
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:26:23 +0200
> "Vegar Lin
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 15:17 +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> ``ipforward_rt'' is going away but rather than sending a big diff,
> here's the first step.
>
> This diff replaces in_rtaddr() by rtalloc(9). Note that since the code
> here is interested in rt_ifa it has to call rtisvalid(9) to preven
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:26:23 +0200
"Vegar Linge Haaland" wrote:
> probing: pc0 mem[444K 88K 511M 1374M 19M]
> Disk:BlockSize=256 LastBlock=16383
> Hit any key to reboot
The result above means the disk is 4MB and its bllock size 256 bytes.
This seems strange for me.
> Also, I forgot to mention th
Hi, with the diff below I get:
probing: pc0 mem[444K 88K 511M 1374M 19M]
Disk:BlockSize=256 LastBlock=16383
Hit any key to reboot
Also, I forgot to mention this in my first post, sorry, not sure if it is
relevant though:
I am testing this using a USB-stick with everything on a encrypted softraid.
15 matches
Mail list logo