On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:38:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:26:14 +0200
> > From: Patrick Wildt
> >
> > +void
> > +mainbus_iterate(struct device *self, struct device *match, int node)
> > +{
> > + for (;
> > + node != 0;
> > + node = OF_peer(node))
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:26:14 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> +void
> +mainbus_iterate(struct device *self, struct device *match, int node)
> +{
> + for (;
> + node != 0;
> + node = OF_peer(node))
> + {
> + /* skip nodes that are already handled by some driv
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:30:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/04/16(Fri) 17:23, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff replaces the ARM mainbus with a new implementation. This
> implementation works like the old version if there's no device tree.
>
> But if there is a device tree, this tree will be used to enumerate
> and attach a
When using raw ip6 socket, one can connect(2) then send(2), or
just sendto(2). The code below would try to find the non-connected
raw ip6 socket corresponding to an incoming icmp6 message, to deliver
the failure. This code has been disabled ever since it has been put
in-tree, justifiably so because
On 08/04/16(Fri) 17:23, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > >
> > > There are a few drivers that need spec
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:09:38PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/04/16(Fri) 17:14, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > so that we can easily check if a node
On 08/04/16(Fri) 17:14, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
> > > that are compatible, I would like to add
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:14:03PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
> > > that are compatible, I
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:14:03 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
> > > that are compatible,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:53:35 +0200
> > From: Patrick Wildt
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > wi
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
> > that are compatible, I would like to add helpers to the fdt routines.
> >
> > This way the drive
On 08/04/16(Fri) 14:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
> that are compatible, I would like to add helpers to the fdt routines.
>
> This way the drivers can check if they "match" to a node by simply
> calling:
>
> if (fdt_
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:53:35 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > with the feedback received on the fdt bus, the fdt stuff will now be
> > > replac
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > with the feedback received on the fdt bus, the fdt stuff will now be
> > replacing the mainbus. [..snip..]
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > [..snip..]
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
so that we can easily check if a node is compatible or to find nodes
that are compatible, I would like to add helpers to the fdt routines.
This way the drivers can check if they "match" to a node by simply
calling:
if (fdt_node_compatible(ma->ma_node, "samsung,exynos4210-ehci"))
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the feedback received on the fdt bus, the fdt stuff will now be
> replacing the mainbus. [..snip..]
>
> Patrick
>
> [..snip..]
Hi,
have you planned ahead which route you are going to take with regards to
how drivers
Hi,
this diff replaces the ARM mainbus with a new implementation. This
implementation works like the old version if there's no device tree.
But if there is a device tree, this tree will be used to enumerate
and attach all device drivers.
Currently drivers kind of depend on each other. This mea
Every now and then I see "spurious interrupt 34" messages on octeon
serial console. The root cause seems to be in comstart() which enables
the TX holding register empty interrupt before writing data to the TX
register. If the register is empty initially, the early enabling can
trigger a premature i
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:44:11 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> Hi,
>
> with the feedback received on the fdt bus, the fdt stuff will now be
> replacing the mainbus. While doing that I noticed that the cortex
> bus matches every time on config_found, which is because it doesn't
> check the att
Hi,
with the feedback received on the fdt bus, the fdt stuff will now be
replacing the mainbus. While doing that I noticed that the cortex
bus matches every time on config_found, which is because it doesn't
check the attach args.
ok?
Patrick
diff --git sys/arch/arm/cortex/cortex.c sys/arch/arm
> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:31:22 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:00:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > just be the enumeration mechanism for "mainbus". And I think armv7
> > should be the same.
>
> That sounds more like implementing the fdtbus functionality, but
On 07/04/16(Thu) 18:31, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:00:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > [...]
> > I have no objections to rename fdt.c fdt_subr.c. However, I do object
> > against having an "fdt" bus, at least for socppc. The fdt code should
>
> I don't propose an fdt b
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:35:34PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/04/16(Tue) 09:20, David Gwynne wrote:
> > vlan config is now done via the vnet and parent ioctls. the idea
> > is config can be set up while the vlan interface is down, and then
> > "committed' when it is brought up and runnin
Hi!
I'm trying to figure out whether or not OpenBSD supports Altera's Cyclone V
FPGA:
https://www.altera.com/products/fpga/cyclone-series.html
Any comments?
-j.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:41:00PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/04/16(Mon) 22:56, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:07:47PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > > On 4 Apr 2016, at 6:41 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > On 04/04/16(Mon) 13:09, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > >> #i
26 matches
Mail list logo
