On 2015-11-14 04:28, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:45:44 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
>>> This patch changes the default setting to 1.5 *
>>> (number_of_cpus_in_system) instead, which I find better matches modern
>>> behaviour.
>>
>> A larger number is sensible in this position.
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:45:44 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > This patch changes the default setting to 1.5 *
> > (number_of_cpus_in_system) instead, which I find better matches modern
> > behaviour.
>
> A larger number is sensible in this position.
>
> I would propose 8. I don't agree with a ca
On 2015-11-14 00:45, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> This patch changes the default setting to 1.5 *
>> (number_of_cpus_in_system) instead, which I find better matches modern
>> behaviour.
>
> A larger number is sensible in this position.
>
> I would propose 8. I don't agree with a calculation like that
> This patch changes the default setting to 1.5 *
> (number_of_cpus_in_system) instead, which I find better matches modern
> behaviour.
A larger number is sensible in this position.
I would propose 8. I don't agree with a calculation like that; the
amount of work a system can do should not be ca
Hi tech@,
Inspired by the flurry of changes to cron(8) the last couple of days, I
finally went to fix an issue that has bitten me numerous times over the
years, since I'm a heavy user of batch(1) and at(1):
When running a batch/at job, cron looks at the system's current load
average to determine
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:28:24 +
> From: Miod Vallat
>
> > The SDHC on this machine comes with a 64-bit BAR, so we need to fix
> > that XXX. I did change the error handling a bit such that we give up
> > after the first unmappable BAR. It seems multi-slot controllers are
> > rare and it
Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:52:01PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> > > > ok for removing xfree from aucat?
> > >
> > > yes, ok ratchov; if later this causes me merges i'll find another
> > > solution. Feel free to do the same in usr.bin/sndiod, as it's
> > > almo
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Theo de Raadt wrote on Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:21:41AM -0700:
> > Theo Buehler wrote:
>
> >> This straightforward pledge("stdio") is one of the last uncommitted ones
> >> from Theo's big 'tame in userland' diff and seems to have been
> >> overlooked so far.
>
> > I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> It is similar to (optional) XMODEM/ZMODEM disciplines over serial, IMO.
>
> No, it is similar to over the INTERNET, because the INTERNET
> is nothing at all like a serial line, the later generally being nicely
> contained to a single room.
> Can telnet be extended to coexist with nc -F? Manual only mentions ssh.
Please don't email while driving your horse buggy.
Ricardo Mestre(ser...@helheim.mooo.com) on 2015.11.13 18:00:11 +:
> Hello,
>
> If '-n' argument is used on route(8) then nflag will be active and dns
> transactions won't be needed, am I correct?
please find out yourself.
at least the pledge call in monitor will fail with -n and your diff,
s
> It is similar to (optional) XMODEM/ZMODEM disciplines over serial, IMO.
No, it is similar to over the INTERNET, because the INTERNET
is nothing at all like a serial line, the later generally being nicely
contained to a single room.
> The goal is to delete classic telnet entirely and make it an
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > On 2015/11/13 09:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > > > > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
>> > > >
>> > > > I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
>> > > > Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that pur
Hi,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:21:41AM -0700:
> Theo Buehler wrote:
>> This straightforward pledge("stdio") is one of the last uncommitted ones
>> from Theo's big 'tame in userland' diff and seems to have been
>> overlooked so far.
> I think arch.c gains no value from being p
David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I ve tried to discuss this point with Otto Moerbeek but he might be
> very busy so I throw the topic here if you do not mind ...
>
> I have the habit to enable MALLOC_STATS but with the recent pledge
> feature, it s now difficult to debug some pledged applicatio
> > On 2015/11/13 09:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
> > > >
> > > > I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> > > > Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
> > >
> > > nc(1).
> > I use telnet fairly often for c
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/11/13 09:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
> > >
> > > I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> > > Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
> >
> > nc(1).
> I use telnet fairly of
Hello,
If '-n' argument is used on route(8) then nflag will be active and dns
transactions won't be needed, am I correct?
Index: route.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/route/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.179
diff -u -p -u -r1.179 rou
> > > > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
> > >
> > > I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> > > Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
> >
> > nc(1).
>
> I use telnet fairly often for connecting to things like crappy switches,
> crappy rout
On 2015/11/13 09:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
> >
> > I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> > Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
>
> nc(1).
I use telnet fairly often for connecting to things like crap
> > I really want to delete telnet entirely,
>
> I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
nc(1).
> You might wish to cross-check these three points though:
>
> * Does "inet" actually allow the following setsoc
Hi Theo,
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org 2015/11/13 09:53:46
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/telnet : commands.c telnet.1
>
> Log message:
> Delete tracefile command. Tracefiles can now only be specified at
> program startup. Who uses that?
Hi Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:36:23AM -0700:
> I really want to delete telnet entirely,
I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
> but there are still occasions when someone might want t
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:52:21 +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I often use it for testing unencrypted SMTP and HTTP across the
> Internet. Which tool would you recommend for that purpose?
nc
- todd
Hi Martin, good afternoon.
First of all, I want to thank your reply with the comments about the device
driver. I answer you email next to you comments.
2015-11-09 11:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Pieuchot :
> Hello Guillermo,
>
> On 08/11/15(Sun) 17:06, Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver wrote:
> > Hi,
Excuse me, the indentation was removed because message wasn't plain text.
Patch: http://pastebin.com/XnZLEPEk
httpd.conf: http://pastebin.com/gGp3NqCD
rewr.php: http://pastebin.com/prA1NJXC
Hello everyone,
I'm new to OpenBSD and the tech@ list.
I need to run a WordPress-like URL rewriting scheme for my blog. Basically
URLs of the form /long-fancy-blog-post-title/ to be translated to
/index.php?q=long-fancy-blog-post-title.
I couldn't find this function in OpenBSD's new httpd which
> This straightforward pledge("stdio") is one of the last uncommitted ones
> from Theo's big 'tame in userland' diff and seems to have been
> overlooked so far.
I think arch.c gains no value from being pledged. It adds a system
call to a program which makes no user-input decisions.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Gregor Best wrote:
> I've done some further testing and I think I've narrowed it down to the
> "Unlocking em(4) a bit further"-patch [0].
That was the start of it for me.
When I could revert to rev 1.305 for if_em.c and rev 1.57 for if_em.h
all was fine. But the
On 11/12/15 14:10, Ted Unangst wrote:
Chris Turner wrote:
>>>
The attached patch calls fsync(2) on related FD's in the login(3)
routines, which corrected the problem on my test machine,
and imho might be a good idea in general.
AFAIK it should not be necessary to call fsync() before close().
> An idea would be to open the fd at init time, which should be early
> enough for most cases (i.e. before the first pledge(2) call). Big
> drawback is the open fd all the time until program exits.
Keeping a fd open through libc runtime is not going to fly. It isn't
just the fragility of it. T
This straightforward pledge("stdio") is one of the last uncommitted ones
from Theo's big 'tame in userland' diff and seems to have been
overlooked so far.
Index: usr.bin/arch/arch.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/arch/arch.c,v
retriev
nm(1) was tamed shortly before the "exec" promise was introduced. The
"proc exec" is necessary to cover `nm -C' which fork-exec's c++filt(1).
Right after potential fork-exec, the original pledge "stdio rpath" is
given (one could make that last pledge call in the file conditional on
`issize' so tha
> I ve tried to discuss this point with Otto Moerbeek but he might be
> very busy so I throw the topic here if you do not mind ...
>
> I have the habit to enable MALLOC_STATS but with the recent pledge
> feature, it s now difficult to debug some pledged applications with
> MALLOC_OPTIONS=D as, for
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:11:46AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I ve tried to discuss this point with Otto Moerbeek but he might be
> very busy so I throw the topic here if you do not mind ...
>
> I have the habit to enable MALLOC_STATS but with the recent pledge
> feature, it s now
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:52:01PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> > > ok for removing xfree from aucat?
> > >
> >
> > yes, ok ratchov; if later this causes me merges i'll find another
> > solution. Feel free to do the same in usr.bin/sndiod, as it's
> > almost the same.
> >
>
> Same th
On 12/11/15(Thu) 20:22, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This diff adds an initial implementation of 802.11n.
>
> [...]
Looks good. I think you should already put in the chunks below.
Especially the one needed for ifconfig(8).
I think I found a typo...
> Index: net/if_media.h
> ===
Hi all,
I ve tried to discuss this point with Otto Moerbeek but he might be
very busy so I throw the topic here if you do not mind ...
I have the habit to enable MALLOC_STATS but with the recent pledge
feature, it s now difficult to debug some pledged applications with
MALLOC_OPTIONS=D as, for ma
I really want to delete telnet entirely, but there are still occasions
when someone might want to use it on an intranet. Other telnet tools
are probably worse shape.
This adds two pledge calls.
The subshell and skey support are removed (you can use ^Z), and you
cannot start a new telnet session.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:22:07PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This diff adds an initial implementation of 802.11n.
While testing this diff, please pay attention to stuttering
behaviour in audio before and after applying this diff.
If you're hearing audio stutter as a side effect of this diff,
40 matches
Mail list logo
