On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Ossi Herrala wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:46:20PM +0300, Ossi Herrala wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The following patch makes it possible to build SSH layer 2 (and layer
> > 3) tunnels without using root permissions when connecting.
> >
> > This is achieve
By the way, this is the second version with miod's feedback. Time to
send it to tech@ now, too.
Fixed one issue due to missing braces and less ntohl() calls, which
makes the code easier to read.
Index: catopen.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/sr
Hi,
Currently, in mg dired mode, if you mark a file as deleted, if the
dired buffer is refreshed (using 'dired-revert' for example) the
marking of files is lost. This diff fixes that by saving the marked
files before they are lost, then remarking them once the buffer is
refreshed. Comments/oks?
-
Hello,
I am trying to boot -current on 86duino EduCake and I found it crashes when
wdcintr() (sys/dev/ic/wdc.c) is called.
Here is the log.
>> OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 3.27
boot> boot -c
\|/-\|/booting hd0a:/bsd:
-\|/-7692020\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\
ping?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:46:20PM +0300, Ossi Herrala wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The following patch makes it possible to build SSH layer 2 (and layer
> 3) tunnels without using root permissions when connecting.
>
> This is achieved by root setting up everything beforehand so sshd
> doesn'
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> If syslogd is started with -S, it accepts TLS connections to receive
> encrypted traffic. The server certificates are taken from /etc/ssl
> like relayd does.
Anyone?
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/evbuffer_tls.c
=
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:36:11 +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> This reminds me of something I've always wondered, but never gotten
> around to ask about...
>
> Why is the return value in return statements almost always enclosed in
> parantheses in the codebase?
>
> It's not explained in style(9) as
Hello,
We're currently evaluating if we should keep providing support
for ActivCard, CRYPTOCard and SNK-004 authentication tokens via
login_token(8). If you're a user of "activ", "crypto", "snk" or
"token" authentication methods (check your /etc/login.conf),
please speak up so that we could estim
On 6 October 2015 at 14:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Mike Belopuhov
>> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:18:39 +0200
>>
>> On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog
>> > timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to s
> From: Mike Belopuhov
> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:18:39 +0200
>
> On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog
> > timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a proper bug
> > report to bugs@. Anyway, here i
On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog
> timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a proper bug
> report to bugs@. Anyway, here is a diff that might fix the issue.
> Please test, even if you're not exper
... since this has low impact unless it's enabled in config, I think most
things relating to this could be worked on in-tree. The main change for
people not using snmp would be in session_dispatch_imsg() relating to
config reload, but it seems sane to me and doesn't cause any problems
here.
this is ok with me
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:25:57PM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> On 2015-10-06 09:56, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > I am not convinced, changing errno like this is gratuitous. We actually
> > do do it elsewhere, but IMO that is unnecessary too.
>
> That's fair
The OID in snmp.c doesn't match the RFC, it should be like this:
#define OIDIDX_bgp4 7
static struct snmp_oid bgpd4oid = {
{ 1, 3, 6, 1, 2, 1, 15 },
7
};
With that fixed, I can fetch single values, but walking fails:
$ snmpget -On -m+BGP4-MIB -v2c -c public 127.0.0.
Hi Nicholas,
On 2015-10-06 09:56, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> I am not convinced, changing errno like this is gratuitous. We actually
> do do it elsewhere, but IMO that is unnecessary too.
That's fair enough. One can argue whether a certain error code is better
suited than another until the cows c
> On October 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> What do you think about a similar treatment for locale/rune.c?
I think you refer to _Read_RuneMagi function,
which lacks the same input validation.
Before supplying a patch for that one, I wanted to get some feedback
for catopen/catgets.
On 2015/10/06 08:48, Eric Ripa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my private mail host today to the latest 5.8-current snapshot (5th
> of october). Now bgpd keeps crashing. The previous snapshot (from around 14th
> of september) was working fine.
>
> I have a quite simple setup with only the reference
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:48:07AM +0200, Eric Ripa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my private mail host today to the latest 5.8-current snapshot (5th
> of october). Now bgpd keeps crashing. The previous snapshot (from around 14th
> of september) was working fine.
>
> I have a quite simple setup wi
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:01:59PM +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our catopen implementation does not check the parsed message catalog,
> making it vulnerable to all sorts of out of boundary accesses.
This is interesting stuff, but I haven't found time to read through it yet.
What do
Since it was brought up on misc, there's been some off-list
interest in work I did during c2k15 that's timed out with
off-list testers.
The following diff implements a subset of RFC 4273, with
no export of individual route entries, which would be sheer
madness over snmp, and for which better tools
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:09:00AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/10/15(Mon) 23:03, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I find this approach easier to follow and it doesn't mess with
> > ic->ic_scan_lock which is supposed to be managed by the net80211 layer.
> >
> > Seems to work just as well as the
>
> Be patient. I am not adding all the planned layers to this subsystem
> in one go. There is something being designed for exec, and it will
> show up when the time is right.
Theo and Sebastien,
Thanks for your explanations, My main concern was "What about programs that
actually need exec ?"
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Looks like a logical things for me.
>
> --
> Vadim Zhukov
Thanks. I had just committed it before opening your mail :)
06 окт. 2015 г. 0:00 пользователь "Stefan Sperling"
написал:
>
> This matches what all other wifi drivers seem to be doing.
> ifconfig iwm0 lladdr random still works.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: if_iwm.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/
On 05/10/15(Mon) 23:03, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I find this approach easier to follow and it doesn't mess with
> ic->ic_scan_lock which is supposed to be managed by the net80211 layer.
>
> Seems to work just as well as the old code.
>
> OK?
Mostly. I'd argue that iwm_stop() should still reset
On 05/10/15(Mon) 22:58, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This matches what all other wifi drivers seem to be doing.
> ifconfig iwm0 lladdr random still works.
>
> ok?
Yes please.
> Index: if_iwm.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_i
I am not convinced, changing errno like this is gratuitous. We actually
do do it elsewhere, but IMO that is unnecessary too.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:02AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to review this. I'll try to elaborate on my
> reasoning below.
27 matches
Mail list logo
