Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:46:08AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:13:05 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote:
> > >
> > > > We can put a "long" poll() in front of pcap to wait until there are
> > > > packets
> > > > (maybe never if you
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:46:08AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:13:05 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote:
> >
> > > We can put a "long" poll() in front of pcap to wait until there are
> > > packets
> > > (maybe never if you aren't using pf logging), and the
Hi Michael,
Michael Reed wrote on Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:11:26PM -0400:
> I'm pretty sure the use of Nm was previously wrong,
Indeed. The .Nm macro is only intended for command names that
occur in the NAME section of the respective manual.
> but let me know if I'm off the mark.
>
> Index: sr
Hi Michael,
Michael Reed wrote on Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:24:37PM -0400:
> In bsd.port.mk.5, the use of arguments to Nm is inconsistent,
> and when they are used it's seemingly redundant; this patch
> fixes that.
>
> I verified there's no change in the formatted manual with this:
> $ diff <{mand
On 2015/09/22 23:07, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2015.09.13 16:08:50 +0200:
> > On 13/09/15(Sun) 15:51, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > This makes the kernel simpler as it no longer try to find
Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2015.09.13 16:08:50 +0200:
> On 13/09/15(Sun) 15:51, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > This makes the kernel simpler as it no longer try to find a new ifa
> > > when a route with a stale address is
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2015.09.22 16:01:34 +0200:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:14:18PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Instead of incrementing the rt_use counter when a rtalloc(9) call
> > succeeds, let's do it inside ralloc(9).
> >
> > The route(8) regress tests will need to
In bsd.port.mk.5, the use of arguments to Nm is inconsistent,
and when they are used it's seemingly redundant; this patch
fixes that.
I verified there's no change in the formatted manual with this:
$ diff <{mandoc bsd.port.mk.5.orig} <{mandoc bsd.port.mk.5}
Finally, if anyone is wondering, line 1
I'm pretty sure the use of Nm was previously wrong, but let me
know if I'm off the mark.
Index: src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
retrieving revision 1.422
diff -u -p -r1.422 bsd.po
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:23:17PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Properly reset the RX ring by clearing RX buffer status exposed to hardware.
> > Found by Matthew Dillon while porting FreeBSD's iwm(4) to Dragonfly.
> >
> > ok?
> >
> > Index: if_iwm.c
> > =
Adrian Chadd noted that Linux iwlwifi adds a mac context to the
firmware when the driver initialises the interface, and changes it
(rather than adding it) whenever the interface is brought up.
This does the same for iwm(4).
ok?
Index: if_iwm.c
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Properly reset the RX ring by clearing RX buffer status exposed to hardware.
> Found by Matthew Dillon while porting FreeBSD's iwm(4) to Dragonfly.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: if_iwm.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/d
Adrian Chadd noted that Linux iwlwifi sends the broadcast address to
the firmware when not associated, rather than zeros.
ok?
Index: if_iwm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -p -r1.46 if
Properly reset the RX ring by clearing RX buffer status exposed to hardware.
Found by Matthew Dillon while porting FreeBSD's iwm(4) to Dragonfly.
ok?
Index: if_iwm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c,v
retrieving revision 1
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:13:05 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote:
>
> > We can put a "long" poll() in front of pcap to wait until there are packets
> > (maybe never if you aren't using pf logging), and then let the timeout work
> > it's magic.
>
> This:
>
> > + if (poll(
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:13:05 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote:
> We can put a "long" poll() in front of pcap to wait until there are packets
> (maybe never if you aren't using pf logging), and then let the timeout work
> it's magic.
This:
> + if (poll(&pfd, 1, INFTIM) == 1) {
will also ma
I recall this discussion on UTF-8 and locales:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150722182236
I imagine there was more elsewhere that I didn't see.
Brian
On Sep 22, 2015 7:07 AM, "Benny Lofgren" wrote:
> On 2015-09-21 16:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Christian Weisgerber
> >
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:14:18PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Instead of incrementing the rt_use counter when a rtalloc(9) call
> succeeds, let's do it inside ralloc(9).
>
> The route(8) regress tests will need to be updated because all the
> paths calling rtalloc(9) do not increment rt_use.
Instead of incrementing the rt_use counter when a rtalloc(9) call
succeeds, let's do it inside ralloc(9).
The route(8) regress tests will need to be updated because all the
paths calling rtalloc(9) do not increment rt_use.
This change gives us a better understanding of which routes are queried
an
On 2015-09-21 16:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Christian Weisgerber
>> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:29:03 + (UTC)
>>
>> On 2015-09-21, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
> You could argue that the thousands separator should be supported though:
>
> $ sleep 1.000.000
>
> if your locale is somethin
On 17/09/15(Thu) 02:34, Grant Czajkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:04:35PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 15/09/15(Tue) 04:50, Grant Czajkowski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:41:04AM -0600, David Coppa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Repeatedly hit the panic be
21 matches
Mail list logo
