On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:41:04AM -0600, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Repeatedly hit the panic below with latest ugen.c code (v 1.88) and
> pcsc-lite.
Thanks for the report. Could you please try this patch?
Grant
Index: ugen.c
===
Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> As far as I can tell there haven't been any new bits added for almost 20
> years, so I expect we can do without the Tflag typedef.
>
> ok?
yup
Hi
As far as I can tell there haven't been any new bits added for almost 20
years, so I expect we can do without the Tflag typedef.
ok?
Index: proto.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/proto.h,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r
Michael McConville wrote:
> Index: mv.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mv/mv.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.40
> diff -u -p -r1.40 mv.c
> --- mv.c 24 Aug 2015 00:10:59 - 1.40
> +++ mv.c 14 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -
> @@ -
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Michael McConville wrote:
> > > There will probably be more similar patches to come if this is
> > > acceptable. The legwork was done with the following Coccinelle script:
> >
> > I think it should be spli
>Michael McConville wrote:
>> Index: mv.c
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mv/mv.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.40
>> diff -u -p -r1.40 mv.c
>> --- mv.c 24 Aug 2015 00:10:59 - 1.40
>> +++ mv.c 14 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -
>These used to be necessary but now that NULL is (void *)0 they
>aren't.
>
>I'd be inclined to keep them anyway - with the cast it is clearly not a
>bug, without is not so clear. There are also loads of them and it'd be a
>lot of churn to fix them all, for no real advantage. But I don't feel
>stron
Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Here is a diff, also make %p better
that looks better. sigh. why does this even exist?
Hi Paul,
I have tried the last -current/octeon (and 5.7/octeon) on a D-Link
DSR-500N (HW A1), but the bootoctlinux command failed.
Regards,
U-Boot 1.1.1 (Development build, svnversion: exported) (Build time: Sep
1 2010 - 16:21:09)
Warning: Board descriptor tuple not found in eeprom, using
Martin Pieuchot [m...@openbsd.org] wrote:
> Currently we leave RTF_STATIC route entries in the table when the
> address they are attached to is removed from a system.
>
> That's why ifas need to be refcounted and that's why we have *a lot*
> of checks in the stack to not use cached routes attached
Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> These used to be necessary but now that NULL is (void *)0 they
> aren't.
>
> I'd be inclined to keep them anyway - with the cast it is clearly not a
> bug, without is not so clear. There are also loads of them and it'd be a
> lot of churn to fix them all, for no real adv
These used to be necessary but now that NULL is (void *)0 they
aren't.
I'd be inclined to keep them anyway - with the cast it is clearly not a
bug, without is not so clear. There are also loads of them and it'd be a
lot of churn to fix them all, for no real advantage. But I don't feel
strongly abo
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Michael McConville
wrote:
...
> - execl(_PATH_CP, "cp", "-PRp", "--", from, to, (char *)NULL);
> + execl(_PATH_CP, "cp", "-PRp", "--", from, to, NULL);
Nope, this is a case in C where the cast is necessary. To quote style(9):
NUL
Index: mv.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mv/mv.c,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -p -r1.40 mv.c
--- mv.c24 Aug 2015 00:10:59 - 1.40
+++ mv.c14 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ copy(char *from, char
Ted Unangst wrote:
> Michael McConville wrote:
> > There will probably be more similar patches to come if this is
> > acceptable. The legwork was done with the following Coccinelle script:
>
> I think it should be split up, but I'm happy to see diffs like this.
Is this small enough? It's just lib
* Martin Pieuchot [2015-09-11 13:54]:
> On 11/09/15(Fri) 13:28, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > Ryan pointed me to this diff and we briefly discussed it; we remain
> > convinced that the in-tree approach is better than this.
> Could you elaborate why?
Well we've been thru it more than once; the argumen
this is an attempt to make the interrupt path in vmx mpsafe.
seems to hold up under load here, but more testing would be
appreciated.
Index: if_vmx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_vmx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -
Hi,
Here a first sets of "if(x) free(x)" cleanup in sys/arch/
This patch contains only trivial if(x) removal. The size argument in
free is keep untouched (because it is already setted, or because it
makes sens to keep it to 0).
Comments ? OK ?
--
Sebastien Marie
Index: b/sys/arch/amd64/stand/l
ok?
Index: PROJECTS
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/PROJECTS,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 PROJECTS
--- PROJECTS28 Nov 2013 10:33:37 - 1.7
+++ PROJECTS14 Sep 2015 07:53:30 -
@@ -109,6 +109,3 @@ Things
Here is a diff, also make %p better
Index: shf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/shf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 shf.c
--- shf.c 13 Sep 2015 19:43:42 - 1.17
+++ shf.c 14 Sep 2015 07:47:02 -
@
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 05:31:10PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> Index: if_urtwn.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/if_urtwn.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.51
> diff -u -p -r1.51 if_urtwn.c
> --- if_urtwn.c10 Sep 2015 1
21 matches
Mail list logo