Index: faq10.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq10.html,v
retrieving revision 1.194
diff -u -p -r1.194 faq10.html
--- faq10.html 2 Jul 2015 05:49:04 - 1.194
+++ faq10.html 5 Sep 2015 03:27:45 -
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ This
I found the answer... from 11 years and 5 months ago (see Theo's commit below).
The "New Technologies" section of security.html has not been changed since
then. I will try to propose something, but it will take me a while to go
through all of the releases and summarize things appropriately for
Single quotes or double quotes? I left single as single, and double as double,
but "fixed" (or is that 'fixed'?) them both.
Is there any interest in bring the "New Technologies" section up to date? It
seems like lots of additional good stuff has been done. When I point our new
guys to this page
At this stage we can actually avoid grabbing the lock in the default
pool backend allocator, as long as the PR_WAITOK flag isn't set. This
is safe because:
* The pmemrange allocator can be called without holding the kernel
lock.
* On pmap_direct architectures, we simply use the direct map to a
Hi Tim,
Tim van der Molen wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:05:41PM +0200:
> Tim van der Molen (2015-09-04 17:12 +0200):
>> The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a
>> mere example (and not a real man page), and cpuid(6) does not refer to a
>> man page, but to a CPUID
Tim van der Molen (2015-09-04 17:12 +0200):
> The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a
> mere example (and not a real man page), and cpuid(6) does not refer to a
> man page, but to a CPUID function.
Actually, pkg(5) referring to a Solaris man page would be a more
proba
Hey Tim,
That all makes sense, thanks! I was not sure so I thought I would pass it
along anyway for your consideration.
Rob
Original Message
From: Tim van der Molen
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 11:12 AM
To: Rob Pierce
Cc: tech
Subject: Re: plus58.html hrefs
Rob Pierce (2015-09-04 06:29
Rob Pierce (2015-09-04 06:29 +0200):
> There is also a reference to smu(4) that appears to be broken, as well as an
> unreferenced pkg(5) and cupid(6) that I couldn't resolve.
Thanks, Rob!
The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a
mere example (and not a real man page
On 4 September 2015 at 16:15, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> We might call pool_put(9) on the bnx_tx_pool from bnx_watchdog() which
> runs from a timeout. So this one doesn't get PR_WAITOK.
>
> ok?
>
>
Sure.
On 4 September 2015 at 14:49, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> As far as I can tell, these pools are only ever used from process
>> context as well.
>>
>> ok?
>
> mikeb@ pointed out that pf_rm_rule() may be called from interrupt
> co
We might call pool_put(9) on the bnx_tx_pool from bnx_watchdog() which
runs from a timeout. So this one doesn't get PR_WAITOK.
ok?
Index: if_bnx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bnx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.112
diff -u -p -
Hello,
after reading emails from Philip Guenther and Mark Kettenis, doing some RTFM on
locking in OpenBSD kernel I have a new patch. I call it as a smp-step-0.
Patch introduces a KERNEL_LOCK() to PF. Many dances with KERNEL_LOCK() happens
in pf_test(). From future work point of view there are dis
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> As far as I can tell, these pools are only ever used from process
> context as well.
>
> ok?
mikeb@ pointed out that pf_rm_rule() may be called from interrupt
context. So here is an updated diff that drops the PR_WAITOK fl
As far as I can tell, these pools are only ever used from process
context as well.
ok?
Index: pf_if.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pf_if.c,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 pf_if.c
--- pf_if.c 21 Jul 2015 02:32:04 -
Hi
I like this and I would use it in tmux (I have utf8_strvis which is not
as strict). The code looks good on a quick read but I'm not a Unicode
expert either.
I'd like to see useful UTF-8 stuff go into libutil or somewhere common,
but I guess perhaps the time of the UTF-8 hackathon in October (i
15 matches
Mail list logo