On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:35:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/07/06 13:40, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm not an ssl hacker at all, but while debugging openssl -starttls
> > issues against an xmpp server, i stumbled upon
> > https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=286
On 07/07/15 06:34, Pavel Plamenov wrote:
> Updated patch, paying more attention to style.
>
> Index: plus52.html
...
yep, I like those. Thanks!
Nick.
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/www/plus52.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p
> 2015-06-26 9:20 GMT+03:00 Claudio Jeker :
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:59:32AM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> during building l2tp tunnel with xl2tpd-1.3.1 I was faced with its too
>>> low upload performance. When download, the speed is 20 mbit/s at
>>> nearly 100% CPU u
On 7/7/15, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I prefer this diff instead.
Thanks. I too like this better.
--patrick
> - todd
>
> Index: usr.bin/vi/common/exf.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/vi/common/exf.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:15:06PM -0600, Dale Lindskog wrote:
> It is discouraged but possible to run pkg_add(1) with -n or -s as a user
> other than root. However, if pkg_add(1) does not have write permission to
> $PKG_CACHE, then unclear error messages are produced. For example:
>
> $ ls -l
Maybe not yet but at least I'd like to do the ARP request a bit later.
We create a RTF_LOCAL route entry for every configured address. So
use this information to emit a "who-has" for the configured address.
This also has the advantage of *not* sending an ARP request if
something wrong happens b
I prefer this diff instead.
- todd
Index: usr.bin/vi/common/exf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/vi/common/exf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -p -u -r1.36 exf.c
--- usr.bin/vi/common/exf.c 24 Apr 2015 21:48:31 - 1
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 05:52:54PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > >Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine
> many
> > > >use sudo
> > >
> > > Sorry, we are making room in the tree so that lynx can come back.
>
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:56:35 +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Now that packet headers include the interface index of their receiving
> interface, pass it directly to in6_addr2scopeid().
>
> This does not change anything with regards to the scopeid hack but it
> reduces the number of if_get().
OK,
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:51:12 +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I'd like to remove this 16 years old define. We always used the correct
> behavior. My goal is to reduce the uses of if_get().
>
> Ok?
I'm in favor of fewer useless knobs. OK millert@.
- todd
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:51:22 +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> New patch with lines removed.
Makes sense. OK millert@
- todd
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:15:20PM -0600, Dale Lindskog wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> > If you don't have root access, should you really be installing packages?
>
> It is impossible to install packages when you are not root. pkg_add won't
> let you.
>
> This isn't about
Now that packet headers include the interface index of their receiving
interface, pass it directly to in6_addr2scopeid().
This does not change anything with regards to the scopeid hack but it
reduces the number of if_get().
Ok?
Index: netinet/udp_usrreq.c
I'd like to remove this 16 years old define. We always used the correct
behavior. My goal is to reduce the uses of if_get().
Ok?
Index: netinet6/frag6.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/frag6.c,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote:
> nsd.conf may contain keys, so store its checksum only. Also update the
> path to unbound's root.key.
Thanks Tim, committed.
I did change /var/unbound/db/root.key to be stored as a checksum as well.
> Index: changelist
> ===
On 2015/07/06 13:40, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm not an ssl hacker at all, but while debugging openssl -starttls
> issues against an xmpp server, i stumbled upon
> https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2860&user=guest&pass=guest
> which fixes some issue with -starttls xmpp and adds
Updated patch, paying more attention to style.
Index: plus52.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/plus52.html,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 plus52.html
--- plus52.html 2 Jul 2015 05:49:04 - 1.11
+++ plus52.html 7 Jul 2
Fix some titles and make others more descriptive.
Index: plus52.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/plus52.html,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 plus52.html
--- plus52.html 2 Jul 2015 05:49:04 - 1.11
+++ plus52.html 7 Ju
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:25:30AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> Note I am unsure on a point: the array is defined to be _CACHED_RUNES
> (1<<8 = 256) elements in size. Here the initialisation is for 128
> elements.
>
> > int tab[256] = {0, 1, 2, ..., 126, 127};
>
> Should the rest of the arr
On 2015-07-06 Mon 23:08 PM |, Chris Bennett wrote:
> If you want to have a writable PKG_CACHE, why not do something simple
> like /home/dude/pkg_cache?
>
$ printenv PKG_CACHE
/var/cache/pkgs
$ ls -lod /var/cache /var/cache/pkgs
drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel nodump 512 May 28 21:57 /var/cache/
drwx
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:37:34AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:25:30AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > _C_ctype_ (ctype) and _DefaultRuneLocale.rl_runetype (wctype) are
> > currently unsynced, resulting regress/lib/libc/locale/check_isw to
> > failed.
>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:25:30AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> _C_ctype_ (ctype) and _DefaultRuneLocale.rl_runetype (wctype) are
> currently unsynced, resulting regress/lib/libc/locale/check_isw to
> failed.
>
> The problem is _C_ctype_ (in gen/ctype_.c) and _DefaultRuneLocale (in
> l
Hi,
_C_ctype_ (ctype) and _DefaultRuneLocale.rl_runetype (wctype) are
currently unsynced, resulting regress/lib/libc/locale/check_isw to
failed.
The problem is _C_ctype_ (in gen/ctype_.c) and _DefaultRuneLocale (in
locale/runetable.c) define differently characters class for char >= 0x80.
After c
ping?
On 6/9/15, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Noticed a regression with vi and recent changes to timespec
> data types.
>
> To reproduce, run vi without a file name to edit. Try save buffer
> via ":w" and you'll be presented by following message:
>
> file modified more recently than this t
24 matches
Mail list logo
