I’m sorry but I can’t provide private key.
It is basically production and not self-signed. Comes from Thawte.
I’m able to produce output from ‘openssl enc -d base64 < key’,
so issue from the link you pointed out is not on my side.
I’m following OpenBSD-current by moving from snap to snap.
I ju
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:22 AM, mxb wrote:
> Hey,
>
> getting following error on OpenBSD-current as of yesterdays 'cvs up’:
Does this imply that it worked in some earlier version of
OpenBSD-current? If so, what was the version that worked?
> unable to load Private Key
> 30008934842236:error:090
> Work on current is something that naturally occurs. It does not mean there
> are enough resources to *duplicate that work* and do the same on stable.
Obvious facts make obvious points.
The snapshots for current and the security errata is good enough for
me. It's easy and allows me to run curren
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:41:16AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Lack of
> > resources is about the only good reason there is for not providing
> > binary updates.
>
> That's not true.
>
> Further, base + packages are updated frequently in snapshots, which is
> exactly a binary upgrade path f
Hi,
On 6/29/15, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> It's surprising but many users don't know the "R" option. OK?
>
> The webpage with the patch applied:
> http://juanfra684.devio.us/tmp/faq4.html#InstDisks
>
> diff --git faq/faq4.html faq/faq4.html
> index 51606b3..f2b9486 100644
> --- faq/f
It's surprising but many users don't know the "R" option. OK?
The webpage with the patch applied:
http://juanfra684.devio.us/tmp/faq4.html#InstDisks
diff --git faq/faq4.html faq/faq4.html
index 51606b3..f2b9486 100644
--- faq/faq4.html
+++ faq/faq4.html
@@ -946,15 +946,18 @@ The installer has pr
> Lot of angry fuss over words on a web page.
Indeed.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hrCVu25wQ5s
I have no wishes and the discontent with the proposed patch is gone
now.
Lot of angry fuss over words on a web page.
> > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:58:19 -0400
> > > Bryan Steele wrote:
> > >
> > > Carlos' patch may not be appropriate, but you're kind of a
> > > condecending jerk, especially for someone who's apparently
> > > never sent mail to the OpenBSD lists before. Who are you?
> > >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 201
> Are you proposing that the whole of FAQ 9 should be scrapped?
May it be proposed to you that you further advise Carlos on improving
his suggested patch or scrapping this knitting already.
Whose idea was to stoke the binpatch theme anyway, somebody of
commercial interest?
No such thing is requi
On 2015-06-29 09.52.19 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> That being said, FAQ is *not* an "OpenBSD for former Linux users" guide,
FAQ 9 is titled "Migrating to OpenBSD", four of the five sections have
"Linux" in the title, and the one section that does not mentions Linux
twice in the first paragraph.
A
OK millert@
- todd
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:19:36PM BST, Mike Burns wrote:
> On 2015-06-29 09.52.19 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
>
> > That being said, FAQ is *not* an "OpenBSD for former Linux users"
> > guide,
>
> FAQ 9 is titled "Migrating to OpenBSD", four of the five sections have
> "Linux" in the title, and the
i saw this problem compiling.
all the /usr/xenocara/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/md.* files referenced
libfreetype.so.23.0 instead of ...24.0 which is what is being built, so it
didn't get packaged.
looks like Theo already fixed this:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=143557821008977&w=2
so tomorro
mpi@ pointed out in private that both FreeBSD and DragonFly where
already splitting struct declaration and typedef and that they use
another naming convention. Namely, they don't shorten descriptor not
interface.
Following patch apply that to each of our usb struct and update the
ioctl related str
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:40:37AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I have added a -U feature for syslogd to specify an explict bind
> address to receive UDP packets. One advantge over -u and the *
> sockets is, that you can bind to localhost and divert the packets
> with pf. It is also possible t
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 07:10:19PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 20:26:31 +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> > Why? And what should I document in the manpage then?
>
> So you don't break existing scripts that might use it. You don't
> need to document it.
ok?
Index: bin/ps
Hi,
I just updated from a 5.7-current snapshot (15th June) to a recent one
(29th June).
Now, when I try to 'startx' I get the following error:
$ startx
xauth: (stdin):1: bad display name "turin.local:0" in "add" command
/usr/X11R6/bin/X: can't load library 'libfreetype.so.24.0'
xinit: giving up
On 2015/06/28 12:31, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to store all syslog messages received from a specific host
> into a single log file. For programs this is already implemented
> for !prog blocks. So do the same with +host for hostnames.
>
> This implementation is based on a diff that
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:21:14AM BST, Carlos Fenollosa wrote:
> Thanks Sebastien,
>
> Here’s a new rewrite with your contributions.
>
> If I may, I’d suggest to keep this list item short, as a summary, and maybe
> write a longer
> section on the FAQ expanding on it with more detail. If you fe
2015-06-29 10:21 GMT+02:00 Remi Locherer :
> Hi
>
> I think the following additions to the rdomain(4) man page would be
> usefull for people that want to start using rdomains and rtables.
>
> nitpick
> +.Sh CAVEATS
> +When an
> +.Nm rtable
> +allready exists a new domain with the same id cannot
Thanks Sebastien,
Here’s a new rewrite with your contributions.
If I may, I’d suggest to keep this list item short, as a summary, and maybe
write a longer
section on the FAQ expanding on it with more detail. If you feel that’s
appropriate, I can
volunteer to write it too.
Carlos
Index: faq9
Hi
I think the following additions to the rdomain(4) man page would be
usefull for people that want to start using rdomains and rtables.
Remi
Index: rdomain.4
===
RCS file: /home/remi/cvs/src/share/man/man4/rdomain.4,v
retrieving r
23 matches
Mail list logo
