Hi,
On Debian lists was been reported a new version of "chromium" have a closed
source module that
activate the audio recording without the user concern.
Since the chromium package are in ftp and (I think) on CD, should OpenBSD
Project remove it?
Here is the report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Snapshots will be in disarray for the next day or two as I
move everything from 5.7 to 5.8-beta.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:53:57PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> *edp1* and *edp2* could be used uninitialized, if *goto closem;* is called.
>
Such initializers hiding a false positive, cause the compiler does not
understand this case can never happen.
-> warning: 'edp1' may b
Hi tech@,
*edp1* and *edp2* could be used uninitialized, if *goto closem;* is called.
Regards,
--F.
Index: diffdir.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/diff/diffdir.c,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -p -r1.43 diffdir.c
--- diffdir.c
Any ok for this, and the same for rcs? (And ssh?)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:42:04PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> as requested by nicm@, xstrdup calls strdup(3) now.
>
> Regards,
> --F.
>
>
> Index: xmalloc.c
> ==
> + err(1, "xstrdup");
slight tweak, usually the err output is:
err(1, "strdup")
Hi tech@,
as requested by nicm@, xstrdup just wrappes strdup(3).
Regards,
--F.
Index: xmalloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/xmalloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 xmalloc.c
--- xmalloc.c 24 Apr 2015 01:36:0
Hi tech@,
as requested by nicm@, xstrdup calls strdup(3) now.
Regards,
--F.
Index: xmalloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/diff/xmalloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 xmalloc.c
--- xmalloc.c 29 Apr 2015 04:00:25 -0
Hi tech@,
as requested by nicm@, xstrdup calls strdup(3) now.
Regards,
--F.
Index: xmalloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/file/xmalloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 xmalloc.c
--- xmalloc.c 24 Apr 2015 16:24:11 -0
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:25:07PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:22:27AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > What about diff and ssh and file? They all use the a copy of the same
> > xmalloc.c.
> >
> >
>
> Personally, I would recommend that "xstrdup" just calls str
Hi,
This patch corrects a read after bound that occurs in strcmp (line just
after the added bound check).
Found with afl.
--
Sébastien Marie
Index: elf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/nm/elf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to report a SEGFAULT in nm(1) that occurs with object-file
> with no section headers (e_shnum = 0).
>
>
> Index: elf.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/sr
Hi,
I would like to report a SEGFAULT in nm(1) that occurs with object-file
with no section headers (e_shnum = 0). This object-file was generated by
eg++ (I am not sure if the object-file is valid or not).
I am also able to reproduce the problem with edited elf object (using
hte [editors/ht]) by
It makes sense to not retransmit a packet on the interface it was
received from but we should still call bridge_localbroadcast() on
this interface otherwise the network stack never see this packet.
This fix the configuration where you have a vlan(4) on top of an
interface in a bridge(4) and the vl
On 08/06/15(Mon) 16:11, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> This is the last pseudo-driver conversion.
>
> The idea is to run bridge_input() *before* any ifih on an interface.
> Doing so allow us to remove the hack between vlan(4) and bridge(4)
> and simplify the logic for "stacked" ifih.
>
> With that net/
On 08/06/15(Mon) 15:58, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below moves bridge_output() to if_output(). It fixes the case I
> already described some weeks ago where you have a physical interface
> in a bridge and a vlan on top of it which is not in the bridge.
>
> It also change the loop prevention cod
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:22:27AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> What about diff and ssh and file? They all use the a copy of the same
> xmalloc.c.
>
>
Personally, I would recommend that "xstrdup" just calls strdup(3), as
Theo said: it's 100.00% portable.
But I don't think I'm the right pers
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 23:57 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> You're definitely on to something. It certainly looks like your diff
> fixes the bug. However, if there is no constraint, it would make
> sense to pick a page from the size tree of the right type. Not sure
> if that optimization would r
Fixed, thanks
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> just saw I missed removing the null check before calling free(3), sorry.
>
> Regards,
> --F.
>
>
> Index: ci.c
> ===
> RCS file: /c
Hi tech@,
just saw I missed removing the null check before calling free(3), sorry.
Regards,
--F.
Index: ci.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/ci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.220
diff -u -p -r1.220 ci.c
--- ci.c13 Jun 2015 20
20 matches
Mail list logo