New LibreSSL mailing lists

We have two new lists for LibreSSL: libre...@openbsd.org - public list for technical discussion about LibreSSL on any operating system. libressl-secur...@openbsd.org - private list for reporting severe vulnerabilities in OpenSSL or LibreSSL to the core LibreSSL team. See http://www.openbsd.org/

Re: vmxnet3 panic

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 23:14 +0200, mxb wrote: > > Any chance to get this committed? > Stepped on it once more without this patch. > I'd like to. OKs? > //mxb > > On 2015-05-22 19:53, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > >vmx doesn't check if it's wasn't stopped before calling rx/tx > >interrupt routines

Re: vmxnet3 panic

Any chance to get this committed? Stepped on it once more without this patch. //mxb On 2015-05-22 19:53, Mike Belopuhov wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 19:35 +0200, mxb wrote: Hey, got a panic as of todays ‘cvs up’ trace below panic: vmxnet3_rxintr: NULL ring->m[44] Stopped at Debugger+0

Re: from(1): don't warn for missing mail spool

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:15:05 -0600, "Todd C. Miller" wrote: > Some mail clients remove the user's spool file instead of truncating > it. There's no reason to warn in this case unless the user specified > a file with the -f flag. Better version that uses the same exit value for a missing spool fi

Re: ftp(1) rewrite

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:25:15PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015/06/01 10:20, patrick keshishian wrote: > > > On 6/1/15, Sunil Nimmagadda wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:16:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> screw ftp. just make a new util http, tha

Re: Journal Implementation

> On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Walter Neto wrote: > > Analising the tips, I decided to implement one given by Paul, It is less > dramatic, and solves the problem. Analysing* sorry the english.. I’ll improve! > > ok? > >> On Jun 3, 2015, at 2:37 AM, Ville Valkonen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On

Re: Journal Implementation

Analising the tips, I decided to implement one given by Paul, It is less dramatic, and solves the problem. ok? > On Jun 3, 2015, at 2:37 AM, Ville Valkonen wrote: > > Hi, > > On Jun 3, 2015 3:17 AM, "Walter Neto" wrote: > > > > Thanks guys.. > > > > I will read all the tips, and start to cod

from(1): don't warn for missing mail spool

Some mail clients remove the user's spool file instead of truncating it. There's no reason to warn in this case unless the user specified a file with the -f flag. - todd Index: usr.bin/from/from.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/fro

Re: pf_create_state() is sometimes better to use pf_unlink_state()

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 23:46 +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > > > >> > > >> But we'll drop this "reference" in pf_src_tree_remove_state, > > >> then how will sns[PF_SN_NAT] and sns[PF_SN_ROUTE] be different? > > > > > > I think I should take PF class again ;-) I've just realized there > > > is

Re: FUSE Patches

Stefan Sperling writes: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 01:17:27AM +0800, Helg wrote: >> I thought I might be a bit late with this but thanks for letting me >> know. I'll keep working on it and submit the patches individually once >> 5.7 is released. > > Any news? FUSE patches are exciting... I'm Lo

Re: FUSE Patches

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 01:17:27AM +0800, Helg wrote: > I thought I might be a bit late with this but thanks for letting me > know. I'll keep working on it and submit the patches individually once > 5.7 is released. Any news?