* Johan Ymerson [2015-05-19 19:25]:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:16 +, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2015/05/19 10:10, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > > Yes I understand that, but if carp init was counted in "LINK_STATE_DOWN"
> > > then the
Hi tech,
The attached patch fixes a problem I’ve been having with httpd +
php_fpm + owncloud on 5.7. The patch is against 5.7-release.
After several days running owncloud with httpd, php_fpm started
complaining about hitting pm.max_children, and top would show a
bunch of idle php_fpm processes wa
Hi,
xstrdup just wrappes strdup, so there is no need to call xmalloc and
strlcpy instead.
Regards,
--F.
Index: xmalloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/xmalloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 xmalloc.c
--- xmallo
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:16 +, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/05/19 10:10, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> >
> > Yes I understand that, but if carp init was counted in "LINK_STATE_DOWN"
> > then the metric would be 65535 which I think would
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Dariusz Swiderski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached patch implements support for yet another Tolopai (EP80579)
> based soho router. As some of you might remeber I wrote the original
> support for this platform during h2k9.
>
> In this case, the board is named Teak 3020, and not only
On Tue, 19 May 2015 09:56:53 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I think the consensus was easy to form. People using -u right now
> collect root's giant limits, which is not sensible.
Actually, they retain the invoking user's limits. But either way,
it is surprising.
- todd
> The consensus seems to be that "chroot -u" should apply the settings
> in /etc/login.conf by default. Since this is a non-standard flag
> we can do what we like with it. I should have used setusercontext()
> when I added -u to chroot in the first place.
>
> We can add a "-c class" option in th
The consensus seems to be that "chroot -u" should apply the settings
in /etc/login.conf by default. Since this is a non-standard flag
we can do what we like with it. I should have used setusercontext()
when I added -u to chroot in the first place.
We can add a "-c class" option in the future if
Hi!
As bpf devices is a some limited resource, and as far as i know the kernal is
like single-thread when performing filtering each packet thr many active bpf
devices.
So the question applying to ethernet trunk where one eth port spans multiple
vlans, or i.e. multiple mpe.In terms of performance
On 19/05/15(Tue) 15:28, Maxime Villard wrote:
> -- netinet/ip_icmp.c --
>
> 925 rt = rtalloc(sintosa(&sin), RT_REPORT|RT_RESOLVE, rtableid);
> if (rt == NULL)
> return (NULL);
>
> /* Check if the route is actually usable
On Mon, May 18, 2015 6:30 pm, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Currently, "chroot -u" doesn't use the settings in /etc/login.conf.
Nice. I was missing this option.
>
> Open questions:
>
> 1) Should this just be default behavior with -u? Are there cases
>when you would *not* want to set the priority
Hi,
I put here a bug among others:
-- netinet/ip_icmp.c --
925 rt = rtalloc(sintosa(&sin), RT_REPORT|RT_RESOLVE, rtableid);
if (rt == NULL)
return (NULL);
/* Check if the route is actually usable */
if (r
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/05/19 10:10, Johan Ymerson wrote:
>
> Yes I understand that, but if carp init was counted in "LINK_STATE_DOWN"
> then the metric would be 65535 which I think would still avoid the
> problem you're seeing, and would involve less s
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:30:33PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Currently, "chroot -u" doesn't use the settings in /etc/login.conf.
> This adds a -c option to apply the via setusercontext(). We can't
> use LOGIN_SETALL since the uid change has to happen after chroot(2)
> and the groups may be sp
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:12:24PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> This adds "id -c" to display a user's login class. If no user is
> specified, it looks up the passwd entry based on the real uid and
> displays the corresponding login class.
>
> This is similar to "id -c" in FreeBSD (but they keep
On 15/05/15(Fri) 17:34, mxb wrote:
> Diff is applied. So far no problems.
> Unfortunately I can’t test this fully - no vlans on my side.
Thanks for testing. A "no regression" report is always welcome.
There's some more issues with bridge+vlan but jasper@ also confirmed
this diff improve the situ
On 15/05/15(Fri) 15:53, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Some more if_output() conversion. The xl bits are here because I'd
> like to reduce the number of places where IFQ_ENQUEUE() is used.
>
> After applying this diff you should only have a couple left.
Anyone?
> Ok?
>
> Index: dev/usb/if_upl.c
> ==
On 2015/05/19 10:10, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 10:10 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/05/19 09:03, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:59 +0200, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > > > I have found a peculiar behaviour in ospfd when the physical link of the
> > > >
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 10:10 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/05/19 09:03, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:59 +0200, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > > I have found a peculiar behaviour in ospfd when the physical link of the
> > > parent carp interface is down. The carp interface n
On 2015/05/19 09:03, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:59 +0200, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> > I have found a peculiar behaviour in ospfd when the physical link of the
> > parent carp interface is down. The carp interface net is then announced
> > with it's regular metric.
> >
> > An exam
On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:59 +0200, Johan Ymerson wrote:
> I have found a peculiar behaviour in ospfd when the physical link of the
> parent carp interface is down. The carp interface net is then announced
> with it's regular metric.
>
> An example:
> The cable of em2, parent of carp2 (192.168.254.
21 matches
Mail list logo
