On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Mages Simon wrote:
> we got some Problems with init.
>
> "init died (signal 11 exit 0)"
>
> after using reboot(8) without any flags.
>
> after some investigation i saw that in reboot(8)
> at line 241 folling code starts:
...
> Every process gets a SIGKILL and becom
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Carlos MartÃn Nieto wrote:
> A call to opendir thread-safe and the readdir calls only share the buffer
> within the same directory stream, which is local to this function. Therefore
> this lock does not buy us anything.
committed, thanks
Philip Guenther
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> After discussing with Sven Falempin changed the message to "Packet timed
> out" to be more exact
> updated diff:
What's the output when ping packets or their replies are reordered?
Philip Guenther
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> The following patch replaces the -U flag with a -D flag that forces
> usage of device name in /etc/dumpdates. The default is now to use DUID.
>
> Why?:
> - dump identification would better be unique
> - dumpdates is less human
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 04:50:24PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This diff updates xf86-input-synaptics to the latest release.
> Tested on amd64.
>
> Comments ? OK ?
I've been running it for one week on my 2 machines with touchpads. No
problem.
ok matthieu@.
>
> --
> Alexandr Shad
Alexandr Nedvedicky [alexandr.nedvedi...@oracle.com] wrote:
>
> is missing at pfr_destroy_kentry(). We created patch against OpenBSD CURRENT.
> We have no OpenBSD boxes around, where we could verify our fix.
>
You are aware that OpenBSD supports both host and guest roles of
Sparc system virtuali
If we've gotten by this long without mmap, I think we can keep going a little
longer. Enabling this code would requre more testing than it's worth.
Index: btree/btree.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/db/btree/btree.h,v
retrieving re
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:48:21AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when we ran PF sources through coverity we got an error
> as follows:
>
> 8310 if (ri->r->dst.addr.type == PF_ADDR_TABLE)
> 8311 pfr_update_stats(ri->r->dst.addr.p.tbl,
> 8312
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015, at 01:31 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-04-04, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:07:11PM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
> >> Hi tech@
> >>
> >> I'm the maintainer of www/otter-browser and I got caught while packaging
> >> otter-browser 0.9.04. Upstream asked
On 2015-04-04, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:07:11PM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
>> Hi tech@
>>
>> I'm the maintainer of www/otter-browser and I got caught while packaging
>> otter-browser 0.9.04. Upstream asked us to point at a different commit
>> then the tagged revision so we d
Hello,
while testing PBR on Solaris we found out the pfi_kif instances
are not removed from pfi_ifs table. We took a look at crashdump
and have seen pfik_route counter at those object is still
non-zero, while all rules were gone.
looking at sources we can see the 'pfik_route' (PFI_KIF_REF_ROUTE)
Hello,
when we ran PF sources through coverity we got an error
as follows:
8310 if (ri->r->dst.addr.type == PF_ADDR_TABLE)
8311 pfr_update_stats(ri->r->dst.addr.p.tbl,
8312 &s->key[(s->direction == PF_IN)]->
8313
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 12:23:38AM -0400, ian kremlin wrote:
> Hello tech!
>
> A friend is borrowing one of my machines to build the entire pkgsrc
> tree, a task that entails compiling more than 15k individual programs.
> This has taken 3 days, even on my modern and prepared amd64 machine! (to
> m
I do the 32bit sparc packages builds.
We hvae a cluster of 5 machines, and they take roughly 3 weeks to build
if there are no crashes or other issues. Right now thought, not all
machines are able to build, so it will be closer to 5 weeks.
On 2015 Apr 05 (Sun) at 00:23:38 -0400 (-0400), ian kreml
14 matches
Mail list logo
