POSIX says the truncated things are "record(s)" not "block(s)":
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/dd.html
That's what it's historically been too:
http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/dd.c
http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=4.3BSD-Reno/src/bi
We have released LibreSSL 2.1.5, which will be arriving in the
LibreSSL directory of your local OpenBSD mirror soon.
This release is relatively small, focused on bug fixes before 2.2.x
development begins along-side OpenBSD 5.8.
This or earlier LibreSSL releases may also address issues that are to
Editing the device names after the fact is fine for my usage.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> I guess as long as /etc/fstab continues to support non-DUID device
>> names, it can be manually edited after the initial system build.
>
> Of course the non-DUID device names wil
On 2015/03/16 08:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/03/15 21:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/03/15 17:37, System Administrator wrote:
> > > I guess as long as /etc/fstab continues to support non-DUID device
> > > names, it can be manually edited after the initial system build.
> > > Ho
On 2015/03/15 21:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/03/15 17:37, System Administrator wrote:
> > I guess as long as /etc/fstab continues to support non-DUID device
> > names, it can be manually edited after the initial system build.
> > However, that also opens the window to transcription erro
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:27:41 -0600 Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>
> > DUID support was written so that we could solve a problem, without
> > a question. This is a mop-up operation. The question being posed
> > is not "shall we
