On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 12:19:08AM +0600, Артур Истомин wrote:
> No. I wouldn't lift a finger. It is your duty as a developer of "most secure
> OS".
> Do it! Or shut up and stop pretending that OpenBSD in any way secure to use.
Battle rap is off-topic on this mailing list...
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 01:14:32AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:52:12PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2015/03/05 12:41, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > > Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> > > > > Op Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:12:07 +0100 schreef Ted Unangst
> > > > > :
> > > >
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Or you could start with the linked Ubuntu advisory and try to discover where
> they hide the relevant patches. Heaven forbid they directly link to them,
> somebody might discover Ubuntu is based on open source software.
Here are the patches Ub
Артур Истомин wrote:
> >
> > Moving to -current is considerably easier.
>
> So, in fact all 5.6's users sitting with vuln freetype in base now. Excellent!
Perhaps I was unclear, so here's a few suggestions, but far be it for me to
tell anyone else what to do.
You could go through FreeType's com
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:52:12PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/03/05 12:41, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> > > > Op Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:12:07 +0100 schreef Ted Unangst
> > > > :
> > > > > Freetype (http://www.freetype.org/) 2.5.5 was released a little while
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:52:12PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/03/05 12:41, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> > > Op Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:12:07 +0100 schreef Ted Unangst
> > > :
> > > > Freetype (http://www.freetype.org/) 2.5.5 was released a little while
> > > > ago,
