Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:23:10PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Then the question is do we want a/ac/b/g/n for iwm, which is a bit of a > mouthful... Still fits 80 columns so I don't see why not.

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/02/07 00:18, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:57:57PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I had to think about it, it's not obvious. I wouldn't be opposed to changing > > them all to a/b/g/n ... (or a/b/g to avoid getting peoples' hopes up ;-) > > Doesn't that line always

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:57:57PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I had to think about it, it's not obvious. I wouldn't be opposed to changing > them all to a/b/g/n ... (or a/b/g to avoid getting peoples' hopes up ;-) Doesn't that line always describe what the hardware can do? I'm in favour of

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:57:57PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/02/07 08:11, David Gwynne wrote: > > > > > On 7 Feb 2015, at 6:49 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > > On 2015/02/07 06:41, David Gwynne wrote: > > >> man -k ralink confused me for a sec > > >> > > >> ok? > > > > >

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/02/07 08:11, David Gwynne wrote: > > > On 7 Feb 2015, at 6:49 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > On 2015/02/07 06:41, David Gwynne wrote: > >> man -k ralink confused me for a sec > >> > >> ok? > > > > Yes it does, but it isn't the only one, > > > > $ man -k a/b/g/n > > $ man -k a/g/n

Re: Brainy: User-Triggerable Kernel Memory Leak

2015-02-06 Thread Maxime Villard
FWIW, it would be wise to propagate the fix to the stable branch(es). I guess people use compat-linux. Le 31/01/2015 00:33, Alexander Bluhm a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:57:12PM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:55:06 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: >> >>> sosetopt()

use SIZE_MAX in preference to SIZE_T_MAX

2015-02-06 Thread Todd C. Miller
SIZE_MAX is standard, we should be using it in preference to the obsolete SIZE_T_MAX. - todd Index: lib/libc/gen/nlist.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/gen/nlist.c,v retrieving revision 1.58 diff -u -r1.58 nlist.c --- lib/libc/gen/

vi: better size_t overflow check

2015-02-06 Thread Todd C. Miller
Do not rely on unspecified behavior for the overflow check. - todd Index: usr.bin/vi/common/delete.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/vi/common/delete.c,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 delete.c --- usr.bin/vi/common/delete.c

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread David Gwynne
> On 7 Feb 2015, at 6:49 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015/02/07 06:41, David Gwynne wrote: >> man -k ralink confused me for a sec >> >> ok? > > Yes it does, but it isn't the only one, > > $ man -k a/b/g/n > $ man -k a/g/n > athn(4) - Atheros IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device > i

mount_mfs: better size_t overflow check

2015-02-06 Thread Todd C. Miller
Check for overflow before assigning. - todd Index: sbin/newfs/mkfs.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c,v retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -r1.89 mkfs.c --- sbin/newfs/mkfs.c 20 Jan 2015 18:22:21 - 1.89 +++ sbin/new

Re: From lines and mail.local

2015-02-06 Thread patrick keshishian
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:09:57PM +, Martin Brandenburg wrote: > When mail comes in for local delivery with two consecutive lines > beginning 'From ' only the first is escaped with a >. Two non- > consecutive 'From ' lines in one message does not cause this. > > Connect to the local mail serv

Re: syslogd TLS octet counting

2015-02-06 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:00:15AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Implement octet counting for syslog TCP and TLS streams. For TCP > it is optional, but TLS must use this framing. > > Some interoperability tests with remote syslog servers would help. I have updated the diff after my commit to c

[dhcpd] Remove unused variable

2015-02-06 Thread Bertrand PROVOST
Hello, Here is a patch to remove the unused variable `log_priority` from dhcpd. This variable seems to be used as a flag for log priority in `syslog_r`. Log priorities are not flags then it makes non sence at all. Index: dhcpd.c ===

Re: ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/02/07 06:41, David Gwynne wrote: > man -k ralink confused me for a sec > > ok? Yes it does, but it isn't the only one, $ man -k a/b/g/n $ man -k a/g/n athn(4) - Atheros IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device iwn(4) - Intel WiFi Link and Centrino IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device

ral supports 802.11b, doesnt it?

2015-02-06 Thread David Gwynne
man -k ralink confused me for a sec ok? Index: ral.4 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/ral.4,v retrieving revision 1.106 diff -u -p -r1.106 ral.4 --- ral.4 15 Feb 2014 20:28:19 - 1.106 +++ ral.4 6 Feb 2015 20

Rotate & compress accounting logs with newsyslog

2015-02-06 Thread Craig Skinner
Produces:- $ ls -lh /var/account total 8472 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2.7M Feb 6 19:20 acct -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 187K Feb 6 01:30 acct.bak.0.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 206K Feb 5 01:30 acct.bak.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 175K Feb 4 01:30 acct.bak.2.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root whe

From lines and mail.local

2015-02-06 Thread Martin Brandenburg
When mail comes in for local delivery with two consecutive lines beginning 'From ' only the first is escaped with a >. Two non- consecutive 'From ' lines in one message does not cause this. Connect to the local mail server and send > From blah blah > From blah blah And you see in /var/mail/... >

Re: current smtpd: auth failed when username <= 31 chars, Syntax error when username > 31

2015-02-06 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:30:12PM -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > Now, if you auth using another mechanism (ie: listen [...] auth ) > > in theory we do not have the same limitation but I think it will fail as > > we share some